[PATCH v2 1/3] regulator: mt6360: Add OF match table

[Matthias Brugger]

On 11/01/2021 03:18, gene_chen(陳俊宇) wrote:
> [ Internal Use - External ]
> 

Please don't top-post in the future.

> Hi Matthias,
> 
> I discussed OF match table with Mark in previous mail in our PATCH v3,
> MFD should just instantiate the platform device.

Did you ever test that? Which MFD driver should instantiate the device?
I had a look at mt6360-core.c (the obvious one) but I don't see any reference to
the regulator [1]. What am I missing?

> 
>> Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> 於 2020年8月20日 週四 下午7:45寫道：
> 
>>> This device only exists in the context of a single parent device, there
>>> should be no need for a compatible string here - this is just a detail
>>> of how Linux does things.  The MFD should just instntiate the platform
>>> device.
> 
>> Trying to autoload module without of_id_table will cause run-time error:
>> ueventd: LoadWithAliases was unable to load
>> of:NregulatorT(null)Cmediatek,mt6360-regulator
> 
> You shouldn't have this described in the device tree at all, like I say
> the MFD should just instantiate the platform device.
> 

Well from my understanding the regulator has a device-tree entry [2], so it
needs to match against a device-tree node. My understanding is, that you need a
the devicetree node to describe the regulators provided by the device. TBH I'm a
bit puzzled about the comment from Mark here. How does another DT node be able
to reference a regulator if this is not described in DT? I think we need a DT
node here and the matching in the regulator and MFD driver to get the regulator
loaded via udev.

Regards,
Matthias

[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c#L294
[2]
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.10.6/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/mt6360-regulator.yaml

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: matthias.bgg at kernel.org <matthias.bgg at kernel.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, January 9, 2021 7:26 PM
>> To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood at gmail.com>; Mark Brown
>> <broonie at kernel.org>
>> Cc: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang at mediatek.com>; Axel Lin
>> <axel.lin at ingics.com>; Chen Zhong <chen.zhong at mediatek.com>;
>> gene_chen(陳俊宇) <gene_chen at richtek.com>; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org;
>> linux-mediatek at lists.infradead.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
>> Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg at gmail.com>; Matti Vaittinen
>> <matti.vaittinen at fi.rohmeurope.com>; Matthias Brugger
>> <mbrugger at suse.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] regulator: mt6360: Add OF match table
>>
>> From: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger at suse.com>
>>
>> Binding documentation mentions that a compatible is required for the
>> MT6360 device node, but the driver doesn't provide a OF match table.
>>
>> Fixes: d321571d5e4c ("regulator: mt6360: Add support for MT6360 regulator")
>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger at suse.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - check for CONFIG_OF
>> - add Fixes tag
>>
>>  drivers/regulator/mt6360-regulator.c | 9 +++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/mt6360-regulator.c
>> b/drivers/regulator/mt6360-regulator.c
>> index 15308ee29c13..f7b2514feabf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/regulator/mt6360-regulator.c
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/mt6360-regulator.c
>> @@ -445,9 +445,18 @@ static const struct platform_device_id
>> mt6360_regulator_id_table[] = {  };  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform,
>> mt6360_regulator_id_table);
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> +static const struct of_device_id mt6360_of_match[] = {
>> +{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt6360-regulator", },
>> +{ /* sentinel */ },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mt6360_of_match); #endif
>> +
>>  static struct platform_driver mt6360_regulator_driver = {
>>  .driver = {
>>  .name = "mt6360-regulator",
>> +.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(mt6360_of_match),
>>  },
>>  .probe = mt6360_regulator_probe,
>>  .id_table = mt6360_regulator_id_table,
>> --
>> 2.29.2
> ************* Email Confidentiality Notice ********************
> 
> The information contained in this e-mail message (including any attachments) may be confidential, proprietary, privileged, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). Any use, dissemination, distribution, printing, retaining or copying of this e-mail (including its attachments) by unintended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, or believe that you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately (by replying to this e-mail), delete any and all copies of this e-mail (including any attachments) from your system, and do not disclose the content of this e-mail to any other person. Thank you!
>