[PATCH v2 01/23] dt-bindings: iommu: mediatek: Convert IOMMU to DT schema

[Rob Herring]

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:51 PM Yong Wu <yong.wu at mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 17:22 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 04:08:58PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> > > Convert MediaTek IOMMU to DT schema.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu at mediatek.com>
> > > ---
>
> [...]
>
> > > +properties:
> > > +  compatible:
> > > +    enum:
> > > +      - mediatek,mt2701-m4u #mt2701 generation one HW
> > > +      - mediatek,mt2712-m4u #mt2712 generation two HW
> > > +      - mediatek,mt6779-m4u #mt6779 generation two HW
> > > +      - mediatek,mt7623-m4u, mediatek,mt2701-m4u #mt7623 generation one HW
> >
> > This is not right.
> >
> > items:
> >   - const: mediatek,mt7623-m4u
> >   - const: mediatek,mt2701-m4u
> >
> > And that has to be under a 'oneOf' with the rest of this.
>
> Thanks for the review. Is this OK?
>
>   compatible:
>     oneOf:
>       - const: mediatek,mt2701-m4u # mt2701 generation one HW
>       - const: mediatek,mt2712-m4u # mt2712 generation two HW
>       - const: mediatek,mt6779-m4u # mt6779 generation two HW
>       - const: mediatek,mt8173-m4u # mt8173 generation two HW
>       - const: mediatek,mt8183-m4u # mt8183 generation two HW
>       - const: mediatek,mt8192-m4u # mt8192 generation two HW

It is correct, but I prefer all these to be a single enum. So 'oneOf'
would have 2 entries.

>       - description: mt7623 generation one HW
>         items:
>           - const: mediatek,mt7623-m4u
>           - const: mediatek,mt2701-m4u
>
> >
> > > +      - mediatek,mt8173-m4u #mt8173 generation two HW
> > > +      - mediatek,mt8183-m4u #mt8183 generation two HW
> > > +
> > > +  reg:
> > > +    maxItems: 1
>
> [snip]