[PATCH v17 06/12] soc: mediatek: Add support for hierarchical scpsys device node
Matthias Brugger
matthias.bgg at gmail.com
Thu Oct 1 10:33:52 EDT 2020
On 30/09/2020 05:37, Weiyi Lu wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 15:14 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 5:22 PM Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu at mediatek.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Try to list all the power domains of under power controller
>>> node to show the dependency between each power domain directly
>>> instead of filling the dependency in scp_soc_data.
>>> And could be more clearly to group subsys clocks into power domain
>>> sub node to introduce subsys clocks of bus protection in next patch.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu at mediatek.com>
>>> ---
>> [snip]
>>> +static int traverse_scp(struct platform_device *pdev, struct scp *scp,
>>> + const struct scp_domain_data *scp_domain_data)
>>> +{
>>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>>> + struct device_node *sub;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp->dep_links);
>>> +
>>> + for_each_available_child_of_node(np, sub) {
>>> + ret = scpsys_get_domain(pdev, scp, sub, scp_domain_data);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to handle node %pOFn: %d\n", sub, ret);
>>
>> minor comment: this error should not be printed if ret ==
>> -EPROBE_DEFER (use the new dev_err_probe?)
>>
>
> You're right! I'll use dev_err_probe() instead if anyone is interested
> in this series. Thank you!
>
I'd propose that we put all our effort of reviewing and testing into the series
Enric send:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20200910172826.3074357-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com/
Regards,
Matthias
>>> + goto err;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> +err:
>>> + of_node_put(sub);
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>> [snip]
>
More information about the Linux-mediatek
mailing list