[PATCH 2/3] thermal: Add Mediatek thermal driver for mt2701.
Keerthy
a0393675 at ti.com
Thu Jul 7 04:54:40 PDT 2016
Hi Dawei Chien,
On Thursday 07 July 2016 02:36 PM, Dawei Chien wrote:
> This patch adds support for mt2701 chip to mtk_thermal.c,
> and integrate both mt8173 and mt2701 on the same driver.
> MT8173 has four banks and five sensors, and MT2701 has
> only one bank and three sensors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dawei Chien <dawei.chien at mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c | 258 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 165 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
> index 262ab0a..860f2e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> * Copyright (c) 2015 MediaTek Inc.
> * Author: Hanyi Wu <hanyi.wu at mediatek.com>
> * Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
> + * Dawei Chien <dawei.chien at mediatek.com>
> *
> * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> @@ -21,6 +22,7 @@
> #include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> @@ -88,6 +90,7 @@
> #define TEMP_ADCVALIDMASK_VALID_HIGH BIT(5)
> #define TEMP_ADCVALIDMASK_VALID_POS(bit) (bit)
>
> +/* MT8173 thermal sensors */
> #define MT8173_TS1 0
> #define MT8173_TS2 1
> #define MT8173_TS3 2
> @@ -97,35 +100,62 @@
> /* AUXADC channel 11 is used for the temperature sensors */
> #define MT8173_TEMP_AUXADC_CHANNEL 11
>
> -/* The total number of temperature sensors in the MT8173 */
> -#define MT8173_NUM_SENSORS 5
> -
> -/* The number of banks in the MT8173 */
> -#define MT8173_NUM_ZONES 4
> -
> -/* The number of sensing points per bank */
> -#define MT8173_NUM_SENSORS_PER_ZONE 4
> -
> /* Layout of the fuses providing the calibration data */
> -#define MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_VALID BIT(0)
> -#define MT8173_CALIB_BUF1_ADC_GE(x) (((x) >> 22) & 0x3ff)
> -#define MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_VTS_TS1(x) (((x) >> 17) & 0x1ff)
> -#define MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_VTS_TS2(x) (((x) >> 8) & 0x1ff)
> -#define MT8173_CALIB_BUF1_VTS_TS3(x) (((x) >> 0) & 0x1ff)
> -#define MT8173_CALIB_BUF2_VTS_TS4(x) (((x) >> 23) & 0x1ff)
> -#define MT8173_CALIB_BUF2_VTS_TSABB(x) (((x) >> 14) & 0x1ff)
> -#define MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_DEGC_CALI(x) (((x) >> 1) & 0x3f)
> -#define MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_O_SLOPE(x) (((x) >> 26) & 0x3f)
> +#define CALIB_BUF0_VALID BIT(0)
> +#define CALIB_BUF1_ADC_GE(x) (((x) >> 22) & 0x3ff)
> +#define CALIB_BUF0_VTS_TS1(x) (((x) >> 17) & 0x1ff)
> +#define CALIB_BUF0_VTS_TS2(x) (((x) >> 8) & 0x1ff)
> +#define CALIB_BUF1_VTS_TS3(x) (((x) >> 0) & 0x1ff)
> +#define CALIB_BUF2_VTS_TS4(x) (((x) >> 23) & 0x1ff)
> +#define CALIB_BUF2_VTS_TS5(x) (((x) >> 14) & 0x1ff)
> +#define CALIB_BUF0_DEGC_CALI(x) (((x) >> 1) & 0x3f)
> +#define CALIB_BUF0_O_SLOPE(x) (((x) >> 26) & 0x3f)
> +
IMHO the above changes from defining CALIB_BUF1_ADC_GE(x) to
CALIB_BUF0_O_SLOPE(x) can be avoided. We are just renaming the same
defines to a generic name. Instead the macro starting with MT8173 can
only be used wherever needed commonly both by 8173 instance and for
2701 instance.
> +#define NVMEM_TS1 0
> +#define NVMEM_TS2 1
> +#define NVMEM_TS3 2
> +#define NVMEM_TS4 3
> +#define NVMEM_TS5 4
> +
> +/* MT2701 thermal sensors */
> +#define MT2701_TS1 0
> +#define MT2701_TS2 1
> +#define MT2701_TSABB 2
> +
> +/* AUXADC channel 11 is used for the temperature sensors */
> +#define MT2701_TEMP_AUXADC_CHANNEL 11
>
> #define THERMAL_NAME "mtk-thermal"
>
> +/* Maximum support banks */
> +#define MAX_NUM_BANK 5
Why is this 5?
Commit message states: MT8173 has four banks and five sensors, and
MT2701 has only one bank and three sensors. Am i missing something here?
> +
> struct mtk_thermal;
>
> +struct thermal_bank_cfg {
> + unsigned int num_sensors;
> + unsigned int sensors[MAX_NUM_BANK];
> +};
> +
> struct mtk_thermal_bank {
> struct mtk_thermal *mt;
> int id;
> };
>
> +struct mtk_thermal_sense_point {
> + int msr;
> + int adcpnp;
> +};
> +
> +struct mtk_thermal_data {
> + struct thermal_bank_cfg bank_data[MAX_NUM_BANK];
So for MT8173 we are allocating one bank extra and for MT2701 we are
allocating 4 banks extra right? Why not do something like this:
struct thermal_bank *banks_data
Assign the array based on the SoC type?
> + struct mtk_thermal_sense_point sensing_points[MAX_NUM_BANK];
> + int sensor_mux_values[MAX_NUM_BANK];
> + s32 num_banks;
> + s32 num_sensors;
> + s32 auxadc_channel;
> +};
> +
> struct mtk_thermal {
> struct device *dev;
> void __iomem *thermal_base;
> @@ -133,27 +163,20 @@ struct mtk_thermal {
> struct clk *clk_peri_therm;
> struct clk *clk_auxadc;
>
> - struct mtk_thermal_bank banks[MT8173_NUM_ZONES];
> -
> + struct mtk_thermal_bank banks[MAX_NUM_BANK];
Here again some extra memory allocation.
Why not keep a pointer which points to the desired array?
> + const struct mtk_thermal_data *conf;
> /* lock: for getting and putting banks */
> struct mutex lock;
> + struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
>
> /* Calibration values */
> s32 adc_ge;
> s32 degc_cali;
> s32 o_slope;
> - s32 vts[MT8173_NUM_SENSORS];
> -
> -};
> -
> -struct mtk_thermal_bank_cfg {
> - unsigned int num_sensors;
> - unsigned int sensors[MT8173_NUM_SENSORS_PER_ZONE];
> + s32 vts[MAX_NUM_BANK];
> };
>
> -static const int sensor_mux_values[MT8173_NUM_SENSORS] = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 16 };
> -
> -/*
> +/**
> * The MT8173 thermal controller has four banks. Each bank can read up to
> * four temperature sensors simultaneously. The MT8173 has a total of 5
> * temperature sensors. We use each bank to measure a certain area of the
> @@ -166,42 +189,76 @@ static const int sensor_mux_values[MT8173_NUM_SENSORS] = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 16 };
> * data, and this indeed needs the temperatures of the individual banks
> * for making better decisions.
> */
> -static const struct mtk_thermal_bank_cfg bank_data[] = {
> - {
> - .num_sensors = 2,
> - .sensors = { MT8173_TS2, MT8173_TS3 },
> - }, {
> - .num_sensors = 2,
> - .sensors = { MT8173_TS2, MT8173_TS4 },
> - }, {
> - .num_sensors = 3,
> - .sensors = { MT8173_TS1, MT8173_TS2, MT8173_TSABB },
> - }, {
> - .num_sensors = 1,
> - .sensors = { MT8173_TS2 },
> +static const struct mtk_thermal_data mt8173_thermal_data = {
> + .auxadc_channel = MT8173_TEMP_AUXADC_CHANNEL,
> + .num_banks = 4,
> + .num_sensors = 5,
> + .bank_data = {
> + {
> + .num_sensors = 2,
> + .sensors = { MT8173_TS2, MT8173_TS3 },
> + }, {
> + .num_sensors = 2,
> + .sensors = { MT8173_TS2, MT8173_TS4 },
> + }, {
> + .num_sensors = 3,
> + .sensors = { MT8173_TS1, MT8173_TS2, MT8173_TSABB },
> + }, {
> + .num_sensors = 1,
> + .sensors = { MT8173_TS2 },
> + },
> },
> + .sensing_points = {
> + {
> + .msr = TEMP_MSR0,
> + .adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP0,
> + }, {
> + .msr = TEMP_MSR1,
> + .adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP1,
> + }, {
> + .msr = TEMP_MSR2,
> + .adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP2,
> + }, {
> + .msr = TEMP_MSR3,
> + .adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP3,
> + },
> + },
> + .sensor_mux_values = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 16 },
> };
>
> -struct mtk_thermal_sense_point {
> - int msr;
> - int adcpnp;
> -};
> -
> -static const struct mtk_thermal_sense_point
> - sensing_points[MT8173_NUM_SENSORS_PER_ZONE] = {
> - {
> - .msr = TEMP_MSR0,
> - .adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP0,
> - }, {
> - .msr = TEMP_MSR1,
> - .adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP1,
> - }, {
> - .msr = TEMP_MSR2,
> - .adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP2,
> - }, {
> - .msr = TEMP_MSR3,
> - .adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP3,
> +/**
> + * The MT2701 thermal controller has one bank, which can read up to
> + * three temperature sensors simultaneously. The MT2701 has a total of 3
> + * temperature sensors.
> + *
> + * The thermal core only gets the maximum temperature of this one bank,
> + * so the bank concept wouldn't be necessary here. However, the SVS (Smart
> + * Voltage Scaling) unit makes its decisions based on the same bank
> + * data.
> + */
> +static const struct mtk_thermal_data mt2701_thermal_data = {
> + .auxadc_channel = MT2701_TEMP_AUXADC_CHANNEL,
> + .num_banks = 1,
> + .num_sensors = 3,
> + .bank_data = {
> + {
> + .num_sensors = 3,
> + .sensors = { MT2701_TS1, MT2701_TS2, MT2701_TSABB },
> + },
> },
> + .sensing_points = {
> + {
> + .msr = TEMP_MSR0,
> + .adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP0,
> + }, {
> + .msr = TEMP_MSR1,
> + .adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP1,
> + }, {
> + .msr = TEMP_MSR2,
> + .adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP2,
> + },
> + },
> + .sensor_mux_values = { 0, 1, 16},
> };
>
> /**
> @@ -270,13 +327,15 @@ static void mtk_thermal_put_bank(struct mtk_thermal_bank *bank)
> static int mtk_thermal_bank_temperature(struct mtk_thermal_bank *bank)
> {
> struct mtk_thermal *mt = bank->mt;
> + const struct mtk_thermal_data *conf = mt->conf;
> int i, temp = INT_MIN, max = INT_MIN;
> u32 raw;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < bank_data[bank->id].num_sensors; i++) {
> - raw = readl(mt->thermal_base + sensing_points[i].msr);
> + for (i = 0; i < conf->bank_data[bank->id].num_sensors; i++) {
> + raw = readl(mt->thermal_base + conf->sensing_points[i].msr);
>
> - temp = raw_to_mcelsius(mt, bank_data[bank->id].sensors[i], raw);
> + temp = raw_to_mcelsius(mt, conf->bank_data[bank->id].sensors[i],
> + raw);
>
> /*
> * The first read of a sensor often contains very high bogus
> @@ -299,7 +358,7 @@ static int mtk_read_temp(void *data, int *temperature)
> int i;
> int tempmax = INT_MIN;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < MT8173_NUM_ZONES; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < mt->conf->num_banks; i++) {
> struct mtk_thermal_bank *bank = &mt->banks[i];
>
> mtk_thermal_get_bank(bank);
> @@ -322,7 +381,7 @@ static void mtk_thermal_init_bank(struct mtk_thermal *mt, int num,
> u32 apmixed_phys_base, u32 auxadc_phys_base)
> {
> struct mtk_thermal_bank *bank = &mt->banks[num];
> - const struct mtk_thermal_bank_cfg *cfg = &bank_data[num];
> + const struct mtk_thermal_data *conf = mt->conf;
> int i;
>
> bank->id = num;
> @@ -368,7 +427,7 @@ static void mtk_thermal_init_bank(struct mtk_thermal *mt, int num,
> * this value will be stored to TEMP_PNPMUXADDR (TEMP_SPARE0)
> * automatically by hw
> */
> - writel(BIT(MT8173_TEMP_AUXADC_CHANNEL), mt->thermal_base + TEMP_ADCMUX);
> + writel(BIT(conf->auxadc_channel), mt->thermal_base + TEMP_ADCMUX);
>
> /* AHB address for auxadc mux selection */
> writel(auxadc_phys_base + AUXADC_CON1_CLR_V,
> @@ -379,18 +438,18 @@ static void mtk_thermal_init_bank(struct mtk_thermal *mt, int num,
> mt->thermal_base + TEMP_PNPMUXADDR);
>
> /* AHB value for auxadc enable */
> - writel(BIT(MT8173_TEMP_AUXADC_CHANNEL), mt->thermal_base + TEMP_ADCEN);
> + writel(BIT(conf->auxadc_channel), mt->thermal_base + TEMP_ADCEN);
>
> /* AHB address for auxadc enable (channel 0 immediate mode selected) */
> writel(auxadc_phys_base + AUXADC_CON1_SET_V,
> mt->thermal_base + TEMP_ADCENADDR);
>
> /* AHB address for auxadc valid bit */
> - writel(auxadc_phys_base + AUXADC_DATA(MT8173_TEMP_AUXADC_CHANNEL),
> + writel(auxadc_phys_base + AUXADC_DATA(conf->auxadc_channel),
> mt->thermal_base + TEMP_ADCVALIDADDR);
>
> /* AHB address for auxadc voltage output */
> - writel(auxadc_phys_base + AUXADC_DATA(MT8173_TEMP_AUXADC_CHANNEL),
> + writel(auxadc_phys_base + AUXADC_DATA(conf->auxadc_channel),
> mt->thermal_base + TEMP_ADCVOLTADDR);
>
> /* read valid & voltage are at the same register */
> @@ -407,11 +466,12 @@ static void mtk_thermal_init_bank(struct mtk_thermal *mt, int num,
> writel(TEMP_ADCWRITECTRL_ADC_MUX_WRITE,
> mt->thermal_base + TEMP_ADCWRITECTRL);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_sensors; i++)
> - writel(sensor_mux_values[cfg->sensors[i]],
> - mt->thermal_base + sensing_points[i].adcpnp);
> + for (i = 0; i < conf->bank_data[num].num_sensors; i++)
> + writel(conf->sensor_mux_values[conf->bank_data[num].sensors[i]],
> + mt->thermal_base + conf->sensing_points[i].adcpnp);
>
> - writel((1 << cfg->num_sensors) - 1, mt->thermal_base + TEMP_MONCTL0);
> + writel((1 << conf->bank_data[num].num_sensors) - 1,
> + mt->thermal_base + TEMP_MONCTL0);
>
> writel(TEMP_ADCWRITECTRL_ADC_PNP_WRITE |
> TEMP_ADCWRITECTRL_ADC_MUX_WRITE,
> @@ -442,7 +502,7 @@ static int mtk_thermal_get_calibration_data(struct device *dev,
>
> /* Start with default values */
> mt->adc_ge = 512;
> - for (i = 0; i < MT8173_NUM_SENSORS; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < mt->conf->num_sensors; i++)
> mt->vts[i] = 260;
> mt->degc_cali = 40;
> mt->o_slope = 0;
> @@ -467,15 +527,15 @@ static int mtk_thermal_get_calibration_data(struct device *dev,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if (buf[0] & MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_VALID) {
> - mt->adc_ge = MT8173_CALIB_BUF1_ADC_GE(buf[1]);
> - mt->vts[MT8173_TS1] = MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_VTS_TS1(buf[0]);
> - mt->vts[MT8173_TS2] = MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_VTS_TS2(buf[0]);
> - mt->vts[MT8173_TS3] = MT8173_CALIB_BUF1_VTS_TS3(buf[1]);
> - mt->vts[MT8173_TS4] = MT8173_CALIB_BUF2_VTS_TS4(buf[2]);
> - mt->vts[MT8173_TSABB] = MT8173_CALIB_BUF2_VTS_TSABB(buf[2]);
> - mt->degc_cali = MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_DEGC_CALI(buf[0]);
> - mt->o_slope = MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_O_SLOPE(buf[0]);
> + if (buf[0] & CALIB_BUF0_VALID) {
> + mt->adc_ge = CALIB_BUF1_ADC_GE(buf[1]);
> + mt->vts[NVMEM_TS1] = CALIB_BUF0_VTS_TS1(buf[0]);
> + mt->vts[NVMEM_TS2] = CALIB_BUF0_VTS_TS2(buf[0]);
> + mt->vts[NVMEM_TS3] = CALIB_BUF1_VTS_TS3(buf[1]);
> + mt->vts[NVMEM_TS4] = CALIB_BUF2_VTS_TS4(buf[1]);
> + mt->vts[NVMEM_TS5] = CALIB_BUF2_VTS_TS5(buf[2]);
> + mt->degc_cali = CALIB_BUF0_DEGC_CALI(buf[0]);
> + mt->o_slope = CALIB_BUF0_O_SLOPE(buf[0]);
I guess even the above code changes can be avoided if we just retain
macros starting with MT8173?
Best Regards,
Keerthy
> } else {
> dev_info(dev, "Device not calibrated, using default calibration values\n");
> }
> @@ -486,18 +546,36 @@ out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static const struct of_device_id mtk_thermal_of_match[] = {
> + {
> + .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-thermal",
> + .data = (void *)&mt8173_thermal_data,
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-thermal",
> + .data = (void *)&mt2701_thermal_data,
> + }, {
> + },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_thermal_of_match);
> +
> static int mtk_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> int ret, i;
> struct device_node *auxadc, *apmixedsys, *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> struct mtk_thermal *mt;
> struct resource *res;
> + const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> u64 auxadc_phys_base, apmixed_phys_base;
>
> mt = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mt), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!mt)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + of_id = of_match_device(mtk_thermal_of_match, &pdev->dev);
> + if (of_id)
> + mt->conf = (const struct mtk_thermal_data *)of_id->data;
> +
> mt->clk_peri_therm = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "therm");
> if (IS_ERR(mt->clk_peri_therm))
> return PTR_ERR(mt->clk_peri_therm);
> @@ -565,7 +643,7 @@ static int mtk_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto err_disable_clk_auxadc;
> }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < MT8173_NUM_ZONES; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < mt->conf->num_banks; i++)
> mtk_thermal_init_bank(mt, i, apmixed_phys_base,
> auxadc_phys_base);
>
> @@ -592,13 +670,6 @@ static int mtk_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static const struct of_device_id mtk_thermal_of_match[] = {
> - {
> - .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-thermal",
> - }, {
> - },
> -};
> -
> static struct platform_driver mtk_thermal_driver = {
> .probe = mtk_thermal_probe,
> .remove = mtk_thermal_remove,
> @@ -610,6 +681,7 @@ static struct platform_driver mtk_thermal_driver = {
>
> module_platform_driver(mtk_thermal_driver);
>
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Dawei Chien <dawei.chien at mediatek.com>");
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>");
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Hanyi Wu <hanyi.wu at mediatek.com>");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Mediatek thermal driver");
>
More information about the Linux-mediatek
mailing list