[GIT PULL] clk: mediatek: New clocks support and fixes

[Stephen Boyd]

On 10/02, Eddie Huang wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 12:29 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 09/30, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > > Hi Mike,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 5:53 PM, James Liao <jamesjj.liao at mediatek.com> wrote:
> > > > This is a collection of new Mediatek clocks support and fixes. These
> > > > patches come from Joe [1], Pi-cheng [2] and me [3], including clock
> > > > support for subsystems, CPU, GPT and some minor fixes.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6777041/
> > > > [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7174721/
> > > > [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/10/194
> > > >
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > The following changes since commit 1f93e4a96c9109378204c147b3eec0d0e8100fde:
> > > >
> > > >   Linux 4.3-rc2 (2015-09-20 14:32:34 -0700)
> > > >
> > > > are available in the git repository at:
> > > >
> > > >   https://github.com/jamesjjliao/linux.git v4.3-rc2-clk
> > > >
> > > > for you to fetch changes up to 74219612bb7e25e64409171acada05d9949228f2:
> > > >
> > > >   arm64: dts: mt8173: Add subsystem clock controller device nodes (2015-07-09 12:58:14 +0800)
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Will this be pulled for 4.3, or is it now destined for 4.4?
> > > (sorry if you are receiving a duplicate email, the previous had HTML
> > > and was rejected by the lists)
> > 
> > This won't make v4.3. I see that there's a third pull request
> > now, with slightly different contents. Why?
> > 
> 
> Sorry not explain in pull request mail. Third pull request remove two
> patches:
> 
> 1. arm64: dts: mt8173: Add subsystem clock controller device nodes
>    I think this should pull by Matthias, so I suggest James remove this
> patch.
> 
> 2. clk: mediatek: Export CPU mux clocks for CPU frequency control
>    Mike said this patch is ok before
> (http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-August/364886.html) 
> But he told Pi-cheng recently he is working on coordinate clock rate, he
> suggest Pi-cheng change this patch, other patches are ok. So James
> remove this patch.
> Thanks

Ok. Thanks!

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project