[PATCH v3 3/8] soc: Mediatek: Add SCPSYS CPU power domain driver

[Sascha Hauer]

On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 10:59:02AM +0800, Scott Shu wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 10:50 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > don't do this then it indeed doesn't make much sense to put it into the
> > same file.
> > 
> > From what I see we would need to change the prototype to something like
> > 
> > static int __scpsys_power_on(struct scp_domain_data *)
> > 
> > (maybe with some additional base addresses and stuff)
> > 
> > struct scp_domain_data would additionally need sram_isoint_b and sram_ckiso
> > members.
> > 
> > Sascha
> > 
> Hi Sascha,
>    The CPU power sequence is quite different with the others, as
> described below.
> 
> * Non-CPU
>    1) Set PWR_ON_BIT, PWR_ON_2ND_BIT
>    2) Wait PWR_ACK
>    3) Clear PWR_CLK_DIS_BIT
>    4) Clear PWR_ISO_BIT
>    5) Set PWR_RST_B_BIT
>    6) Clear SRAM_PDN
>    7) Wait SRAM_PDN_ACK
> * CPU
>    1) Set PWR_ON_BIT, PWR_ON_2ND_BIT
>    2) Wait PWR_ACK
>    3) Clear PWR_ISO_BIT
>    4) Clear L1_PDN to power on L1
>    5) Wait L1_PDN_ACK
>    6) Set SRAM_ISOINT_B
>    7) Clear SRAM_CKISO
>    8) Clear PWR_CLK_DIS
>    9) Set PWR_RST_B
> For multi-cluster SoC, the cluster power sequence is also different.
> 
> Please think if this is a good idea if we integrate the CPU support into
> the scpsys_power_on()? Based on the readability and compatible
> considerations, we provide this patch.

Maybe it's best if you go back to the v1 layout and put your scpsys code
to arch/arm/mach-mediatek/. While I think it's possible to share some
more code I am not sure anymore if this buys us something. We'll know in
the future.

Sascha


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |