[PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: mediatek: Add smi dts binding

[Yong Wu]

Hi Mark,

On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 11:06 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:07:54AM +0100, Yong Wu wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >     Thanks very much for review. 
> >     About the clock name should be the PoV of _this_ device. Could you
> > help check below?
> > 
> > On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 11:13 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 10:48:18AM +0000, yong.wu at mediatek.com wrote:
> > > > From: Yong Wu <yong.wu at mediatek.com>
> > > > 
> > > > This patch add smi binding document.
> > > 
> > > Please move binding documents to the start of the series. It makes
> > > things far easier to review.
> > >  
> > > What does "larb" mean? It would be nice for the intorductory paragraph
> > > in this file to explain.
> > > 
> > > > +- reg : the register of each local arbiter
> > > > +- clocks : the clocks of each local arbiter
> > > > +- clock-name: larb_sub*(3 clockes at most)
> > > 
> > > The names required _must_ be specified here, or clock-names is
> > > pointless.
> > > 
> > > The clock names should be from the PoV of _this_ device (i.e. they
> > > should be the names of the inputs) not from the PoV of the provider
> > > (i.e. they should not be the names of the outputs from the provider).
> > > 
> > > Mark.
> > > 
> >      After we check with our SMI Designer. Every SMI local arbiter need
> > two clocks, which is called  APB clocks and SMI clock.
> >      APB clock : Advanced Peripheral Bus Clock. It is the clock for
> > setting the register of local arbiter.
> >      SMI clock : Smart Multimedia Interface Clock, It is the clock for
> > transfering the data and command. 
> > 
> >      And all the local arbiters need the smi common clock, so we
> > separate it. 
> > 
> >      Then I prepare to design the smi the dtsi like this: 
> > 
> >       smi_common:smi at 14022000 {
> >                  compatible = “mediate, mt8173-smi”;
> >                  reg = <0 0x14022000 0 0x1000>;
> >                  clocks = <&mmsys MM_SMI_COMMON>;
> >                  clocks-names = “smi_common”;
> >       };
> > 
> >       larb0: larb at 14021000 {
> >                  compatible = “mediate, mt8173-smi-larb”;
> >                  reg = <0 0x14021000 0 0x1000>;
> >                  smi = <&smi_common>;
> >                  clocks = <&mmsys MM_SMI_LARB0>, 
> > 		 	<&mmsys MM_SMI_LARB0>;
> >                  clocks-names = “apb_clk”, “smi_clk”;
> >      };
> > 
> >      larb1: larb at 16010000 {
> >                  compatible = “mediate, mt8173-smi-larb”;
> >                  reg = <0 0x16010000 0 0x1000>;
> >                  smi = <&smi_common>;
> >                  clocks = <&vdecsys VDEC_CKEN>, 
> > 			 <&mmsys VDEC_LARB_CKEN>;
> >                  clocks-names = “apb_clk”, “smi_clk”;
> >       };
> >       … 
> >      In some local arbiter, the source clock of the APB clock and the
> > SMI clock may be the same, like larb0. so the two clocks are the same.
> > And they may be different in other local arbiteres, like larb1.      
> > 
> >      If it is designed like this, is it ok?
> 
> That looks pretty good; the clocks and names on the larb nodes seem
> sensible.
> 
> The naming of the "smi_common" clock on the smi_common node looks a bit
> odd though. Is that really what the clock input is called?
> 
> Mark.
     After check with DE, the smi_common clock also have its APB clock
and the smi clock(they have the same clock source).
    And I prepare to delete "_clk" in all the clock-names.
    So it may be like this:
         smi_common:smi at 14022000 {
                 compatible = “mediate, mt8173-smi”;
                    reg = <0 0x14022000 0 0x1000>;
                  clocks = <&mmsys MM_SMI_COMMON>, 
			   <&mmsys MM_SMI_COMMON>;
                  clocks-names = “apk”,"smi";
        };
     How about this?