[PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: i3c: dw: Add apb reset

[Jisheng Zhang]

On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 05:25:45PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 25/05/2026 16:00, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > Add dt-binding for support of apb reset which is to reset the APB
> > interface.
> 
> And this is ABI break, so you must explain WHY breaking ABI is worth

This just adds an optional apb reset, it doesn't break any exisiting
ABI. Kindly let me know whether adding new optional binding is also
an ABI break.

> doing that or what is the impact. Additionally you should explain which
> devices have it. Does Altera have it? You really lack explanation WHY
> you are doing it and which hardware you exactly describe.

I'm preparing one of synaptics SoCs support to uptream, it needs this
apb reset signal for i3c. So you mean I delay this series until the SoC
upstream series come, right?

> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang at kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/snps,dw-i3c-master.yaml | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/snps,dw-i3c-master.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/snps,dw-i3c-master.yaml
> > index 613dce7757bc..2575442b28ff 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/snps,dw-i3c-master.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/snps,dw-i3c-master.yaml
> > @@ -38,10 +38,12 @@ properties:
> >    resets:
> >      items:
> >        - description: Reset signal
> > +      - description: APB interface reset signal
> >  
> >    reset-names:
> >      items:
> >        - const: core_rst
> > +      - const: apb_rst
> 
> apb
> 
> >  
> >    interrupts:
> >      maxItems: 1
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof