[PATCH v3 1/4] i3c: dw: Remove core reset "_rst" suffix

[Jisheng Zhang]

On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 09:13:58AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 01:51:02PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > It's redundant. This suffix has been in the code from day1, fortunately
> > there's no such dt property usage in all dw i3c users after grepping all
> > dts files, so we can remove it.
> 
> Hm, how could you grep all 3rd party / out of tree users of this?
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang at kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c b/drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c
> > index 655693a2187e..c4a848cc978a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c
> > @@ -1587,7 +1587,7 @@ int dw_i3c_common_probe(struct dw_i3c_master *master,
> >  		return PTR_ERR(master->pclk);
> >  
> >  	master->core_rst = devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive_deasserted(&pdev->dev,
> > -										"core_rst");
> > +										"core");
> 
> ABI impact for something released since 2018. Cleanup of name is not
> really worth affecting users. core_rst is not the best name but it is
> not incorrect, either.
> 
Hmm make sense.
Two questions: if the ABI is introduced but never used by any intree
users, is modifying the ABI taken as "ABI breakage"?

if the ABI is only used by outtree users, can we modify the ABI?


Thanks