[PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: i3c: dw: Add apb reset

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzk at kernel.org
Wed Jun 3 07:36:26 PDT 2026


On 30/05/2026 14:58, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 09:53:16AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 27/05/2026 06:18, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 05:25:45PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 25/05/2026 16:00, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>>>>> Add dt-binding for support of apb reset which is to reset the APB
>>>>> interface.
>>>>
>>>> And this is ABI break, so you must explain WHY breaking ABI is worth
>>>
>>> This just adds an optional apb reset, it doesn't break any exisiting
>>> ABI. Kindly let me know whether adding new optional binding is also
>>> an ABI break.
>>
>> It does. One reset was before. Now all devices must have two resets.
>> Clear ABI impact.
> 
> I checked the dts with only one reset by manual dt_binding_check
> and dtbs_check, it still work, so I'm not sure why those dts "must have
> two resets". Kindly let me know what's wrong.
> 
>>
>>>
>>>> doing that or what is the impact. Additionally you should explain which
>>>> devices have it. Does Altera have it? You really lack explanation WHY
>>>> you are doing it and which hardware you exactly describe.
>>>
>>> I'm preparing one of synaptics SoCs support to uptream, it needs this
>>> apb reset signal for i3c. So you mean I delay this series until the SoC
>>> upstream series come, right?
>>
>> No. You just sent patch which basically says that Altera has two resets,
>> without any explanation of that.
> 
> I guess you mixed other series/patches with mine here, no? I didn't
> mention Altera at all ;) What my series mentioned is adding apb reset
> which is to reset the APB interface.
> 


Read the binding. Altera is already there. I do not talk about other
patches.

Your are changing an already accepted binding.

Best regards,
Krzysztof



More information about the linux-i3c mailing list