[PATCH V3 01/14] i3c: master: Fix recursive locking during device registration
Frank Li
Frank.li at oss.nxp.com
Tue Aug 4 09:46:15 PDT 2026
On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 04:37:57PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> i3c_master_register_new_i3c_devs() registers newly discovered devices
> while holding i3c_bus_normaluse_lock(), a down_read(). device_register()
> can immediately probe the device, and probe callbacks typically invoke
> I3C helpers that take i3c_bus_normaluse_lock() again, leading to a
> recursive acquisition of the same rwsem. rwsems do not support recursive
> read locking and can deadlock when a writer is waiting. See the
> "Recursive read locks" section of Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst.
>
> For example, with Intel LPSS I3C, LOCKDEP generates a WARNING like:
> # echo intel-lpss-i3c.0 > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/mipi-i3c-hci/unbind
> # echo intel-lpss-i3c.0 > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/mipi-i3c-hci/bind
> WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
> kworker/5:1/94 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff88811c810d78 (&i3cbus->lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: i3c_device_match_id+0x45/0x370
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff88811c810d78 (&i3cbus->lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: i3c_master_reg_work_fn+0x21/0x5f0
>
> Fix this by separating device creation from device registration.
> Populate desc->dev under the maintenance lock, collect the devices that
> still need registration into a local list, then release the lock before
> calling device_register(). Finally retake the lock and clean up any
> devices that failed to register.
>
> Use the maintenance lock rather than the normal-use lock while adding
> device objects. A write-side maintenance lock prevents readers from
> observing a partially initialized desc->dev during initial device
> population, or desc->dev disappearing if registration fails.
>
> The local list requires a list node, so add a list node member to struct
> i3c_device.
>
> Fixes: 3a379bbcea0a ("i3c: Add core I3C infrastructure")
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter at intel.com>
> ---
>
>
> Changes in V3:
>
> Added Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
>
> Changes in V2:
>
> New patch
>
>
> drivers/i3c/master.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> include/linux/i3c/master.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> index f485b98805cf..d2fb1a110521 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> @@ -2069,12 +2069,21 @@ static int i3c_master_early_i3c_dev_add(struct i3c_master_controller *master,
> static void
> i3c_master_register_new_i3c_devs(struct i3c_master_controller *master)
> {
> + struct i3c_device *i3cdev, *tmp;
> struct i3c_dev_desc *desc;
> + LIST_HEAD(i3c_unreg_devs);
> int ret;
>
> if (!master->init_done)
> return;
>
> + i3c_bus_maintenance_lock(&master->bus);
> +
> + if (master->shutting_down) {
> + i3c_bus_maintenance_unlock(&master->bus);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> i3c_bus_for_each_i3cdev(&master->bus, desc) {
> if (desc->dev || !desc->info.dyn_addr || desc == master->this)
> continue;
> @@ -2104,25 +2113,37 @@ i3c_master_register_new_i3c_devs(struct i3c_master_controller *master)
> if (desc->boardinfo)
> device_set_node(&desc->dev->dev, desc->boardinfo->fwnode);
>
> - ret = device_register(&desc->dev->dev);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&master->dev,
> - "Failed to add I3C device (err = %d)\n", ret);
> - desc->dev->desc = NULL;
> - put_device(&desc->dev->dev);
> - desc->dev = NULL;
> - }
> + list_add_tail(&desc->dev->node, &i3c_unreg_devs);
> + }
> +
> + i3c_bus_maintenance_unlock(&master->bus);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(i3cdev, tmp, &i3c_unreg_devs, node) {
> + ret = device_register(&i3cdev->dev);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(&master->dev, "Failed to add I3C device (err = %d)\n", ret);
> + else
> + list_del_init(&i3cdev->node);
Is it risk del node without acquire lock?
Frank
> + }
> +
> + i3c_bus_maintenance_lock(&master->bus);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(i3cdev, tmp, &i3c_unreg_devs, node) {
> + list_del(&i3cdev->node);
> + desc = i3cdev->desc;
> + i3cdev->desc = NULL;
> + put_device(&i3cdev->dev);
> + desc->dev = NULL;
> }
> +
> + i3c_bus_maintenance_unlock(&master->bus);
> }
>
> static void i3c_master_reg_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct i3c_master_controller *master = container_of(work, typeof(*master), reg_work);
>
> - i3c_bus_normaluse_lock(&master->bus);
> - if (!master->shutting_down)
> - i3c_master_register_new_i3c_devs(master);
> - i3c_bus_normaluse_unlock(&master->bus);
> + i3c_master_register_new_i3c_devs(master);
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/include/linux/i3c/master.h b/include/linux/i3c/master.h
> index 2dc139a217bf..2b96c4ea75fb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/i3c/master.h
> +++ b/include/linux/i3c/master.h
> @@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ struct i3c_dev_desc {
> * every time the I3C device is rediscovered with a different dynamic
> * address assigned
> * @bus: I3C bus this device is attached to
> + * @node: unregistered device list node
> *
> * I3C device object exposed to I3C device drivers. The takes care of linking
> * this object to the relevant &struct_i3c_dev_desc one.
> @@ -248,6 +249,7 @@ struct i3c_device {
> struct device dev;
> struct i3c_dev_desc *desc;
> struct i3c_bus *bus;
> + struct list_head node;
> };
>
> /*
> --
> 2.53.0
>
More information about the linux-i3c
mailing list