[PATCH v3 1/5] i3c: dw: Add support for AMDI0015 ACPI ID

[Jarkko Nikula]

Hi

On 11/12/24 10:48 AM, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
>> Am I right this and patch 5/5 can be independent from rest of the series?
> 
> Right. 1/5 and 5/5 can be grouped. But rest of the other patches are
> equally important because they drive the usecase.
> 
>>
>> To me it looks these two patches enable bus communication and thus be
>> useful without rest of the series while latter need more discussion
>> (I'll have some notes coming) and Cc'ing linux-acpi.
> 
> I have Cc'ed linux-acpi in this revision. Do you have any feedback for
> patches 2-4 ?
> 
Yes, I'm reviewing them and only the patch 2/5 was Cc'ed to linux-acpi.

Patchset split would serve better in my opinion enabling basic 
communication and have an other set concentrating more complex scenario 
we were try to get input from ACPI folks.