<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>timeout is never < 0, so <span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.292969); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); color: rgb(148, 0, 14); ">status = timeout is never getting run. This patch delete pointless</span></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#94000E"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.292969); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469);">code. Could you show the regression? Thanks.<br></span></font><br></div><div>在 2012-11-15，17:57，Srinidhi Kasagar <<a href="mailto:srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com">srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com</a>> 写道：<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:29:53 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:</span><br><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>- if (timeout < 0) {</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>- dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>- "wait_for_completion_timeout "</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>- "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>- status = timeout;</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>- }</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>-</span><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Looking at the patch context, such code comes later.</span><br></blockquote><span>But it causes regressions; without looking at the "later" code, we can't afford merging</span><br><span>this code now.</span><br><span></span><br><span>regards/srinidhi</span><br><span>--</span><br><span>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in</span><br><span>the body of a message to <a href="mailto:majordomo@vger.kernel.org"><a href="mailto:majordomo@vger.kernel.org">majordomo@vger.kernel.org</a></a></span><br><span>More majordomo info at <a href="http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html"><a href="http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html">http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html</a></a></span><br><span>Please read the FAQ at <a href="http://www.tux.org/lkml/"><a href="http://www.tux.org/lkml/">http://www.tux.org/lkml/</a></a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>