<div>Does anybody knows which kernel version will have support for SD4.0 specs UHS-2?</div>
<div><br> </div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Per Forlin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:per.forlin@linaro.org">per.forlin@linaro.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">On 10 April 2011 05:33, anish singh <<a href="mailto:anish198519851985@gmail.com">anish198519851985@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>><br>> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Jae hoon Chung <<a href="mailto:jh80.chung@gmail.com">jh80.chung@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>>><br>>> Hi Per..<br>>><br>>> I'm applied your patch..and sent the patch about dw_mmc.c.<br>
>> I think good this approach..<br>><br>> Forlin,i too want to test this patch of yours but unfortunately i have<br>> samsung board+SDHCI host controller so i guess i just need to write pre_req<br>> and post_req functions and that would enable this(nonblock mmc request) on<br>
> my board.Hope i am right?<br>You are right. The SDHCI driver should work just fine without<br>implementing pre_req and post_req but you wont see any performance<br>increasing for DMA usage.<br>In order to benefit from the patchset you need to implement pre_req<br>
and post_req.<br><br>If you run into trouble implementing those hooks or if you have any<br>questions please let me know.<br><br>Regards,<br>Per<br><font color="#888888">--<br>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in<br>
the body of a message to <a href="mailto:majordomo@vger.kernel.org">majordomo@vger.kernel.org</a><br>More majordomo info at <a href="http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html" target="_blank">http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Have a nice time !!!<br><br>Cheers,<br>Sachin.<br>