<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 08/10/2010 05:23 PM, Alexander Clouter wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:20100810115351.GL21175@chipmunk" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
* Tanmay Upadhyay <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tanmay.upadhyay@einfochips.com"><tanmay.upadhyay@einfochips.com></a> [2010-08-10 16:20:20+0530]:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
On 08/10/2010 03:58 PM, Alexander Clouter wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
* Tanmay Upadhyay<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tanmay.upadhyay@einfochips.com"><tanmay.upadhyay@einfochips.com></a> [2010-08-10 15:52:14+0530]:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Intention here is to provide SD support by default. It will be switched
to UART mode only if someone asks to do so via kernel parameter. If
someone doesn't give OR gives improper kernel parameter, he/she won't get
UART1. It will simply fall-back to the default setting - which is SD
support.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
My mis-type, I forgot to put a
'kirkwood_sdio_init(&openrd_mvsdio_data);' after my added printk().
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">If I understood correctly, intention behind this is to inform user that
he/she made a mistake while passing the kernel parameters. Is this
correct?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Exactly, and there is no harm turning on the SD slot rather than UART1
at the same time.
Cheers
</pre>
</blockquote>
<small><font face="Courier New, Courier, monospace">Sent version 3 to
the list.<br>
<br>
-- Tanmay</font></small><br>
</body>
</html>