[PATCH v16 22/45] KVM: arm64: CCA: Handle RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE

Marc Zyngier maz at kernel.org
Mon Sep 7 03:10:49 PDT 2026


On Mon, 07 Sep 2026 06:05:29 +0100,
Kohei Enju <enju.kohei at fujitsu.com> wrote:

[...]

> Although the root cause is an RMM bug, should we also guard RIPAS_SET
> against this no-progress case?

No. We really should *prevent* the kernel from using a known broken
RMM. Which brings me to one of my long standing request: how to we
enforce the minimum version of RMM that KVM is willing to work with?

We absolutely need to have a hard deprecation mechanism in place
before day-1.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list