[PATCH 2/7] arm64: head: correct comment for init_kernel_el()
Bradley Morgan
brads at mainlining.org
Wed Sep 2 06:49:57 PDT 2026
On 2 September 2026 14:46:36 BST, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 08:58:34PM +0000, Bradley Morgan wrote:
>> The comment above init_kernel_el() still says the function configures
>> the CPU to execute at the highest reachable EL, but that stopped being
>> true a while back. Ever since commit ae4b7e38e9a94798 ("arm64: Allow
>> sticky E2H when entering EL1"), init_kernel_el() always drops to EL1,
>> and it is finalise_el2() that brings us back up to EL2 when we want it.
>>
>> Update the comment to match what the code actually does.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bradley Morgan <brads at mainlining.org>
>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
>> Cc: James Morse <james.morse at arm.com>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kernel/head.S | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>This looks to be my patch [1], but with a (partially) rewritten commit
>message, and my S-o-B dropped.
>
>There was admittedly one typo in that commit message that needed to be
>fixed, but I don't think the rest of the changes were necessary, and I
>don't think it's approriate to drop my S-o-B.
>
>I think similar is true for the rest of the series. The patch fixing the
>_cpu_resume() only seems to have a paraphrased commit message.
>
>[1]
>https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/commit/?id=ee4323ff6a2ba4c3989b38f13b2c1a516d6c27e4
>
>Mark.
>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
>> index 87a822e5c4ca..c6301557eee1 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
>> @@ -254,9 +254,9 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(__primary_switched)
>> .section ".idmap.text","a"
>>
>> /*
>> - * Starting from EL2 or EL1, configure the CPU to execute at the
>highest
>> - * reachable EL supported by the kernel in a chosen default state. If
>dropping
>> - * from EL2 to EL1, configure EL2 before configuring EL1.
>> + * Starting from EL2 or EL1, configure the CPU to execute at EL1.
>> + * If dropping from EL2 to EL1, configure EL2 before configuring EL1.
>> + * To use VHE we'll upgrade back to EL2 later in finalise_el2().
>> *
>> * Since we cannot always rely on ERET synchronizing writes to sysregs
>(e.g. if
>> * SCTLR_ELx.EOS is clear), we place an ISB prior to ERET.
>> --
>> 2.47.3
Hi mark, do you **WANT** your sob? I don't mind.
I dropped it because it seemed you didn't care about it (or were too
busy),hence, yeah.
--- Thanks!
https://lore.kernel.org/all/EE579805-42F2-4C58-B752-F28779EEB717@grrlz.net/
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list