[PATCH v4 6/8] firmware: smccc: lfa: Register DT interrupt
Andre Przywara
andre.przywara at arm.com
Fri Oct 16 10:43:46 PDT 2026
Hi,
(sorry, forgot to send the reply earlier, that goes together with the
ACPI reply)
On 9/21/26 18:09, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 04:11:09PM +0200, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> The Arm Live Firmware Activation spec describes an asynchronous
>> notification mechanism, where the platform can notify the host OS about
>> newly pending image updates.
>> In the absence of the ACPI notification mechanism also a simple
>> devicetree node can describe an interrupt.
>>
>> Add code to find the respective DT node and register the specified
>> interrupt, to trigger the activation if needed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c b/drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c
>> index 7a55b4a6785d8..a23df331ffde9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/smccc/lfa_fw.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
>> #include <linux/list.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/nmi.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>> #include <linux/psci.h>
>> #include <linux/stop_machine.h>
>> #include <linux/string.h>
>> @@ -871,6 +873,37 @@ static void lfa_remove_acpi(struct device *dev)
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> +static irqreturn_t lfa_irq_handler_thread(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + while (!(ret = activate_pending_image()))
>> + ;
>
> Yet again trusting firmware too much!
Yes, same problem as with the ACPI patch, and will be fixed by the same
new code.
>> +
>> + if (ret != -ENOENT)
>> + pr_warn("notified image activation failed: %d\n", ret);
>> +
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int lfa_register_dt(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> + unsigned int irq;
>> +
>> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,lfa");
>> + if (!np)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
>> + of_node_put(np);
>> + if (!irq)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + return devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL, lfa_irq_handler_thread,
>> + IRQF_COND_ONESHOT, NULL, NULL);
>
> And where can I find free_irq() ? Yes devm_() can do that for you but how
> does that work with races around removal of device for example. I prefer
> to have free_irq() at the very beginning of lfa_remove().
OK, added that.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> static int lfa_smccc_probe(struct arm_smccc_device *sdev)
>> {
>> struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs reg = { 0 };
>> @@ -913,6 +946,12 @@ static int lfa_smccc_probe(struct arm_smccc_device *sdev)
>> pr_info("registered LFA ACPI notification\n");
>> if (err != -ENODEV)
>> return err;
>> + } else {
>> + err = lfa_register_dt(&sdev->dev);
>> + if (!err)
>> + pr_info("registered LFA DT notification interrupt\n");
>> + if (err != -ENODEV)
>> + return err;
>
> More code addition with absolutely no error handling 🙁.
Right, but fixed now by the same code that fixed the ACPI part.
Cheers,
Andre
>
>
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list