❌ FAIL: Test report for for-kernelci (7.3.0-rc4, upstream-arm-next, d820e3ba)

Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas at arm.com
Thu Oct 15 07:39:36 PDT 2026


On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 02:39:43PM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 1:31 PM Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 04:42:05AM -0000, cki-project at redhat.com wrote:
> > > Hi, we tested your kernel and here are the results:
> > >
> > >     Overall result: FAILED
> > >              Merge: OK
> > >            Compile: OK
> > >               Test: FAILED
> > >
> > >
> > > Kernel information:
> > >     Commit message: Merge branch 'for-next/fw-rmi' into for-next/core
> > >
> > > You can find all the details about the test run at
> > >     https://datawarehouse.cki-project.org/kcidb/checkouts/redhat:2947827228
> > >
> > > One or more kernel tests failed:
> > >     Unrecognized or new issues:
> > >         selinux-policy: serge-testsuite
> > >              aarch64
> > >                    Logs: https://datawarehouse.cki-project.org/kcidb/tests/redhat:2947827228_aarch64_kernel_kcidb_tool_1200470666_8
> > >                    Non-passing ran subtests:
> > >                        ❌ FAIL Test
> > >
> > >     We also see the following known issues which are not related to your changes:
> > >         Issue: [upstream] Hardware - Firmware test suite - auto-waive failures
> > >             URL: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/infrastructure/-/issues/779
> > >             Affected tests:
> > >                 Hardware - Firmware test suite [aarch64]
> >
> > Is this another infrastructure issue? From the logs:
> >
> > + nft -f /root/selinux-testsuite/tests/sctp/nftables-flush
> > /root/selinux-testsuite/tests/sctp/nftables-flush:1:17-24: Error: Could not process rule: No such file or directory
> > delete table ip security
> 
> the above is not the source of the failure, that part is expected to
> fail normally.

I have yet to learn how to look at these logs properly ;).

> The problem is the failing binder/test, which is a
> recent regression in mainline that I'm currently investigating. I
> created DW issue https://datawarehouse.cki-project.org/issue/11475 to
> waive these failures for now. I'll update it with a proper link once I
> report the bug / post a fix.

Thanks, good to know. So it's unlikely to be something I pushed into the
for-kernelci branch.

-- 
Catalin



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list