[PATCH net] net: stmmac: xgmac: do not treat TBU as a TX event
Maxime Chevallier
maxime.chevallier at bootlin.com
Mon Oct 12 23:40:58 PDT 2026
Hi,
On 10/13/26 04:47, Pengfei Zhang wrote:
> Commit 8d07a7930434 ("net: stmmac: xgmac: Do not enable TBU interrupt")
> removed TBUE from the default DMA interrupt mask, but did not remove the
> TBU check from dwxgmac2_dma_interrupt().
>
> TBU is set whenever a TX channel runs out of descriptors. Since TBUE is
> not enabled and only enabled bits are cleared, the TBU status bit is
> never cleared. As a result, TBU stays set on every idle TX channel,
> regardless of whether there is any TX traffic.
>
> With a shared interrupt, stmmac_dma_interrupt() checks all channels,
> so every interrupt from any source schedules TX NAPI on every idle TX
> channel.
>
> Only use TI to trigger TX processing.
>
> Fixes: 8d07a7930434 ("net: stmmac: xgmac: Do not enable TBU interrupt")
> Signed-off-by: Pengfei Zhang <zhangfeionline at gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier at bootlin.com>
> ---
> Tested on a board with 8 RX/TX DMA channels behind one shared
> interrupt. A peer sends 10k UDP packets/s to the board and the board
> sends nothing back, so there should be almost no TX work. Every idle
> channel reads DMA_CH_STATUS 0x4 (TBU only).
>
> Per second, averaged over 10 s:
>
> before after
> hw interrupts 9071 8580
> tx_normal_irq_n 72572 1
> tx_clean ~73000 9
>
> - hw interrupts: the shared interrupt line, from /proc/interrupts.
> Unchanged, the RX watchdog sets the rate.
> - tx_normal_irq_n (ethtool -S): how often dwxgmac2_dma_interrupt()
> returned handle_tx. Before the fix every interrupt reports it for
> all 8 channels.
> - tx_clean (ethtool -S): stmmac_tx_clean() runs, i.e. TX NAPI polls.
> Each spurious handle_tx schedules one. What is left after the fix
> is real TX and the TX coalesce timer. The "before" value is from a
> separate run with the same setup.
>
> No packet loss before or after.
If you need to respin, that information should be in the commit log
directly.
Thanks,
Maxime
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list