[PATCH 2/2] kselftest/arm64: Check for -EPERM not -EBUSY in the locking test

Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas at arm.com
Tue Oct 6 07:42:14 PDT 2026

Previous message (by thread): [PATCH 0/2] arm64: gcs: Return -EPERM when changes are prevented by locking
Next message (by thread): [PATCH 2/2] kselftest/arm64: Check for -EPERM not -EBUSY in the locking test
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 08:00:41PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> The API has been updated to return the more permissive -EPERM rather
					      ^^^^^^^^^^
"descriptive" like in the first patch?

-- 
Catalin

Previous message (by thread): [PATCH 0/2] arm64: gcs: Return -EPERM when changes are prevented by locking
Next message (by thread): [PATCH 2/2] kselftest/arm64: Check for -EPERM not -EBUSY in the locking test
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list