[PATCH v22 13/23] KVM: arm64: Abstract out memory abort handling
Suzuki K Poulose
suzuki.poulose at arm.com
Mon Oct 5 22:25:57 PDT 2026
On 06/10/2026 04:07, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On 10/5/26 7:07 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> Move the memory abort handling under VM specific s2 operation.
>>
>> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan at redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v21:
>> - Rename protected_vm_mem_abort => protected_pkvm_mem_abort for
>> consistency
>> with the other callbacks.
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
>> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>
> One nitpick below. In either way:
>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan at redhat.com>
Thanks Gavin !
...
>> +static int kvm_vm_mem_abort(const struct kvm_s2_fault_desc *s2fd)
>> +{
>> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = s2fd->vcpu;
>> +
>> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(kvm_vcpu_trap_is_permission_fault(vcpu) &&
>> + !kvm_is_write_fault(vcpu) &&
>> + !kvm_vcpu_trap_is_exec_fault(vcpu));
>> +
>> + if (kvm_slot_has_gmem(s2fd->memslot))
>> + return gmem_abort(s2fd);
>> + else
>> + return user_mem_abort(s2fd);
>> +}
>
> The "if...else" block is moved from kvm_handle_guest_abort(), but it
> might be
> clearer if we have:
>
> if (kvm_slot_has_gmem(s2fd->memslot))
> return gmem_abort(s2fd);
>
> return user_mem_abort(s2fd);
This was chosen based on another review comment. So, lets stick with
this now.
Cheers
Suzuki
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list