[PATCH 3/3] KVM: arm64: Move stage-2 teardown into kvm_vm_s2_ops

Suzuki K Poulose suzuki.poulose at arm.com
Tue Nov 3 02:33:15 PST 2026


On 03/11/2026 09:37, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Hi Fuad
> 
> On 03/11/2026 08:47, Fuad Tabba wrote:
>> Replace kvm_stage2_destroy()'s is_protected_kvm_enabled() and
>> KVM_PGT_FN() dispatch with a vm_stage2_destroy hook in kvm_vm_s2_ops,
>> like the other stage-2 operations. Both pKVM flavors share
>> pkvm_stage2_destroy(). Like kvm_vm_stage2_destroy(), it takes the range
>> from kvm_phys_size().
>>
>> No functional change intended.
> 
> Someone beat you on this (well almost) ;-)
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/4304d0c7-2220-4add-9c71-e6dc6b4fbc11@arm.com
> 
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba at linux.dev>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  2 ++
>>   arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c              | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
>>   2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/ 
>> asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 97332ffcb1300..b36779bafae9b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_ops {
>>   struct kvm_gfn_range;
>>   struct kvm_s2_fault_desc;
>> +struct kvm_pgtable;
>>   struct kvm_vm_s2_ops {
>>       bool (*vm_age_gfn)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
>> @@ -243,6 +244,7 @@ struct kvm_vm_s2_ops {
>>       void (*vm_stage2_unmap_range)(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
>>                         phys_addr_t start, u64 size,
>>                         bool may_block);
>> +    void (*vm_stage2_destroy)(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt);
>>       int (*vm_mem_abort)(const struct kvm_s2_fault_desc *s2fd);
>>   };
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>> index 10b425a0141be..9df3c80a5acd1 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>> @@ -1029,17 +1029,16 @@ static void stage2_destroy_range(struct 
>> kvm_pgtable *pgt, phys_addr_t addr,
>>       } while (addr = next, addr != end);
>>   }
>> -static void kvm_stage2_destroy(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt)
>> +static void kvm_vm_stage2_destroy(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt)
>>   {
>> -    unsigned int ia_bits = VTCR_EL2_IPA(pgt->mmu->vtcr);
>> +    stage2_destroy_range(pgt, 0, kvm_phys_size(pgt->mmu));

Also, now that stage2_destroy_range is only called for normal KVM,
could we fold that in here ?

Cheers
Suzuki


>> +    kvm_pgtable_stage2_destroy_pgd(pgt);
>> +}
>> -    /* pKVM walks its mapping tree, not the IPA space, and 
>> reschedules per mapping */
>> -    if (is_protected_kvm_enabled())
>> -        pkvm_pgtable_stage2_destroy_range(pgt, 0, BIT(ia_bits));
>> -    else
>> -        stage2_destroy_range(pgt, 0, BIT(ia_bits));
>> -
>> -    KVM_PGT_FN(kvm_pgtable_stage2_destroy_pgd)(pgt);
>> +static void pkvm_stage2_destroy(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt)
>> +{
>> +    pkvm_pgtable_stage2_destroy_range(pgt, 0, kvm_phys_size(pgt->mmu));
>> +    pkvm_pgtable_stage2_destroy_pgd(pgt);
>>   }
>>   /**
>> @@ -1126,7 +1125,7 @@ int kvm_init_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct 
>> kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, unsigned long t
>>       return 0;
>>   out_destroy_pgtable:
>> -    kvm_stage2_destroy(pgt);
>> +    kvm->arch.vm_s2_ops->vm_stage2_destroy(pgt);
> 
> minor nit: should we retain the kvm_stage2_destroy() to dispatch the 
> callback ?
> 
> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com>
> 
> Cheers
> Suzuki
> 
> 
>>       mmu->pgt = NULL;
>>   out_free_pgtable:
>>       kfree(pgt);
>> @@ -1246,7 +1245,7 @@ void kvm_free_stage2_pgd(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
>>       write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>>       if (pgt) {
>> -        kvm_stage2_destroy(pgt);
>> +        kvm->arch.vm_s2_ops->vm_stage2_destroy(pgt);
>>           kfree(pgt);
>>       }
>> @@ -3152,6 +3151,7 @@ static const struct kvm_vm_s2_ops 
>> protected_pkvm_vm_s2_ops = {
>>       .vm_age_gfn            = no_age_gfn,
>>       .vm_test_age_gfn        = no_age_gfn,
>>       .vm_stage2_unmap_range        = no_stage2_unmap_range,
>> +    .vm_stage2_destroy        = pkvm_stage2_destroy,
>>       .vm_mem_abort            = protected_pkvm_mem_abort,
>>   };
>> @@ -3161,6 +3161,7 @@ static const struct kvm_vm_s2_ops pkvm_vm_s2_ops 
>> = {
>>       .vm_age_gfn            = pkvm_age_gfn,
>>       .vm_test_age_gfn        = pkvm_test_age_gfn,
>>       .vm_stage2_unmap_range        = pkvm_stage2_unmap_range,
>> +    .vm_stage2_destroy        = pkvm_stage2_destroy,
>>       .vm_mem_abort            = kvm_vm_mem_abort,
>>   };
>> @@ -3170,6 +3171,7 @@ static const struct kvm_vm_s2_ops 
>> kvm_default_vm_s2_ops = {
>>       .vm_age_gfn            = kvm_vm_age_gfn,
>>       .vm_test_age_gfn        = kvm_vm_test_age_gfn,
>>       .vm_stage2_unmap_range        = kvm_vm_stage2_unmap_range,
>> +    .vm_stage2_destroy        = kvm_vm_stage2_destroy,
>>       .vm_mem_abort            = kvm_vm_mem_abort,
>>   };
> 




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list