[PATCH v7 02/11] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a helper to drain cmd queues
Pranjal Shrivastava
praan at google.com
Fri May 29 07:32:22 PDT 2026
On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 03:09:03PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 10:34:42AM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 06:35:56PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 10:13:58PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> > I'm planning to rename it to arm_smmu_drain_cmdq(), sounds good?
>
> That sounds okay.
>
> Though my series is still at the early review stage, I would like
> to merge those two functions at some point
Makes sense.
>
> Do you know if my implementation can work for cmdq too? Seems that
> only the WFE would be different, which can be a bool?
I think we can definitely unify these. I had a similar approach in my v2.
I've reviewed your PRI series and I think it would be best to use a common
helper for both use cases.
Maybe you include this patch in your series to combine the draining logic
It leverages the helpers you factored out in your Patch 2 and adds a
toggle for the queue_empty requirement of Runtime PM. It also checks for
WFE appropriately:
Subject: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a unified arm_smmu_drain_queue() helper
Introduce a unified arm_smmu_drain_queue() helper to handle both
snapshot-based cohort draining (for IOPF) and polling until queue_empty
(required for Runtime PM).
The helper dynamically checks for the WFE requirement when targeting the
CMDQ and uses cond_resched() to avoid starving the threaded IRQ handlers
responsible for consuming entries from other queues.
Signed-off-by: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan at google.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 866c711b118b..cf41b3cf5985f 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -894,6 +894,38 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_submit(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
cmds->num, true);
}
+static int arm_smmu_drain_queue(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+ struct arm_smmu_queue *q,
+ bool until_empty)
+{
+ struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp;
+ u32 snapshot_prod, cons;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
+
+ /* Secondary CMDQs don't support WFE*/
+ qp.wfe &= (q == &smmu->cmdq.q);
+
+ snapshot_prod = readl_relaxed(q->prod_reg);
+
+ do {
+ u32 target_prod;
+
+ cons = readl_relaxed(q->cons_reg);
+ target_prod = until_empty ? readl_relaxed(q->prod_reg) : snapshot_prod;
+
+ if (__queue_empty(&q->llq, cons, target_prod) ||
+ __queue_consumed(&q->llq, cons, target_prod))
+ return 0;
+
+ cond_resched();
+ } while (!(ret = queue_poll(&qp)));
+
+ dev_warn_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
+ "queue drain timed out at prod=0x%x cons=0x%x\n",
+ readl_relaxed(q->prod_reg), cons);
+ return ret;
+}
+
static void arm_smmu_page_response(struct device *dev, struct iopf_fault *unused,
struct iommu_page_response *resp)
{
--
Thanks,
Praan
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list