[PATCH v3 4/6] mm/vmalloc: Extend page table walk to support larger page_shift sizes and eliminate page table rewalk

Wen Jiang jiangwenxiaomi at gmail.com
Wed May 27 20:39:49 PDT 2026


On Wed, 27 May 2026 at 13:59, Dev Jain <dev.jain at arm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 22/05/26 11:01 am, Wen Jiang wrote:
> From: "Barry Song (Xiaomi)" <baohua at kernel.org>
>
> vmap_pages_range_noflush_walk() (formerly vmap_small_pages_range_noflush())
> provides a clean interface by taking struct page **pages and mapping them
> via direct PTE iteration. This avoids the page table rewalk seen when
> using vmap_range_noflush() for page_shift values other than PAGE_SHIFT.
>
> Extend it to support larger page_shift values, and add PMD- and
> contiguous-PTE mappings as well. Rename it to vmap_pages_range_noflush_walk()
> since it now handles more than just small pages.
>
> For vmalloc() allocations with VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP, we no longer need to
> iterate over pages one by one via vmap_range_noflush(), which would
> otherwise lead to page table rewalk. The code is now unified with the
> PAGE_SHIFT case by simply calling vmap_pages_range_noflush_walk().
>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <baohua at kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Jiang <jiangwen6 at xiaomi.com>
> Tested-by: Xueyuan Chen <xueyuan.chen21 at gmail.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 53fd4ee460ea4..deb764abc0571 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -543,8 +543,10 @@ void vunmap_range(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
>
>  static int vmap_pages_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
>               unsigned long end, pgprot_t prot, struct page **pages, int *nr,
> -             pgtbl_mod_mask *mask)
> +             pgtbl_mod_mask *mask, unsigned int shift)
>  {
> +     unsigned long pfn, size;
> +     unsigned int steps;
>       int err = 0;
>       pte_t *pte;
>
> @@ -575,9 +577,10 @@ static int vmap_pages_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
>                       break;
>               }
>
> -             set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, pte, mk_pte(page, prot));
> -             (*nr)++;
> -     } while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
> +             pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> +             size = vmap_set_ptes(pte, addr, end, pfn, prot, shift);
> +             steps = PFN_DOWN(size);
> +     } while (pte += steps, *nr += steps, addr += size, addr != end);
>
>       lazy_mmu_mode_disable();
>       *mask |= PGTBL_PTE_MODIFIED;
> @@ -587,7 +590,7 @@ static int vmap_pages_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
>
>  static int vmap_pages_pmd_range(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
>               unsigned long end, pgprot_t prot, struct page **pages, int *nr,
> -             pgtbl_mod_mask *mask)
> +             pgtbl_mod_mask *mask, unsigned int shift)
>  {
>       pmd_t *pmd;
>       unsigned long next;
> > @@ -597,7 +600,27 @@ static int vmap_pages_pmd_range(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
> >               return -ENOMEM;
> >       do {
> >               next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
> > -             if (vmap_pages_pte_range(pmd, addr, next, prot, pages, nr, mask))
> > +
> > +             if (shift == PMD_SHIFT) {
> > +                     struct page *page = pages[*nr];
> > +                     phys_addr_t phys_addr;
> > +
> > +                     if (WARN_ON(!page))
> > +                             return -ENOMEM;
> > +                     if (WARN_ON(!pfn_valid(page_to_pfn(page))))
> > +                             return -EINVAL;
>
>
> So I know these !page and !pfn_valid checks have been copied from vmap_pages_pte_range,
> but do they mean anything?
>
> I think pfn_valid() makes sense in that someone may take a random VA/PA, convert it into a struct
> page and pass to vmap layer. But I don't see how anyone would pass page == NULL? At the
> very least, returning ENOMEM does not make sense because the pages are not being
> allocated by vmap() but have already been allocated.

Hi Dev,

vmap() is EXPORT_SYMBOL with many callers across drivers, each
constructing the pages array differently. The !page check guards
against malformed arrays at this API boundary.

The same -ENOMEM issue also exists in vmap_pages_pte_range().
Should I fix both in this patchset or leave it as a separate cleanup?

>
> > +
> > +                     phys_addr = page_to_phys(page);
> > +
> > +                     if (vmap_try_huge_pmd(pmd, addr, next, phys_addr, prot,
> > +                                             shift)) {
> > +                             *mask |= PGTBL_PMD_MODIFIED;
> > +                             *nr += 1 << (shift - PAGE_SHIFT);
> > +                             continue;
> > +                     }
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             if (vmap_pages_pte_range(pmd, addr, next, prot, pages, nr, mask, shift))
> >                       return -ENOMEM;
> >       } while (pmd++, addr = next, addr != end);
> >       return 0;
> > @@ -605,7 +628,7 @@ static int vmap_pages_pmd_range(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
> >
> >  static int vmap_pages_pud_range(p4d_t *p4d, unsigned long addr,
> >               unsigned long end, pgprot_t prot, struct page **pages, int *nr,
> > -             pgtbl_mod_mask *mask)
> > +             pgtbl_mod_mask *mask, unsigned int shift)
> >  {
> >       pud_t *pud;
> >       unsigned long next;
> > @@ -615,7 +638,7 @@ static int vmap_pages_pud_range(p4d_t *p4d, unsigned long addr,
> >               return -ENOMEM;
> >       do {
> >               next = pud_addr_end(addr, end);
> > -             if (vmap_pages_pmd_range(pud, addr, next, prot, pages, nr, mask))
> > +             if (vmap_pages_pmd_range(pud, addr, next, prot, pages, nr, mask, shift))
> >                       return -ENOMEM;
> >       } while (pud++, addr = next, addr != end);
> >       return 0;
> > @@ -623,7 +646,7 @@ static int vmap_pages_pud_range(p4d_t *p4d, unsigned long addr,
> >
> >  static int vmap_pages_p4d_range(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long addr,
> >               unsigned long end, pgprot_t prot, struct page **pages, int *nr,
> > -             pgtbl_mod_mask *mask)
> > +             pgtbl_mod_mask *mask, unsigned int shift)
> >  {
> >       p4d_t *p4d;
> >       unsigned long next;
> > @@ -633,14 +656,14 @@ static int vmap_pages_p4d_range(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long addr,
> >               return -ENOMEM;
> >       do {
> >               next = p4d_addr_end(addr, end);
> > -             if (vmap_pages_pud_range(p4d, addr, next, prot, pages, nr, mask))
> > +             if (vmap_pages_pud_range(p4d, addr, next, prot, pages, nr, mask, shift))
> >                       return -ENOMEM;
> >       } while (p4d++, addr = next, addr != end);
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -static int vmap_small_pages_range_noflush(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> > -             pgprot_t prot, struct page **pages)
> > +static int vmap_pages_range_noflush_walk(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> > +             pgprot_t prot, struct page **pages, unsigned int shift)
> >  {
> >       unsigned long start = addr;
> >       pgd_t *pgd;
> > @@ -655,7 +678,7 @@ static int vmap_small_pages_range_noflush(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> >               next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
> >               if (pgd_bad(*pgd))
> >                       mask |= PGTBL_PGD_MODIFIED;
> > -             err = vmap_pages_p4d_range(pgd, addr, next, prot, pages, &nr, &mask);
> > +             err = vmap_pages_p4d_range(pgd, addr, next, prot, pages, &nr, &mask, shift);
> >               if (err)
> >                       break;
> >       } while (pgd++, addr = next, addr != end);
> > @@ -678,27 +701,13 @@ static int vmap_small_pages_range_noflush(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> >  int __vmap_pages_range_noflush(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> >               pgprot_t prot, struct page **pages, unsigned int page_shift)
> >  {
> > -     unsigned int i, nr = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > -
> >       WARN_ON(page_shift < PAGE_SHIFT);
> >
> > -     if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC) ||
> > -                     page_shift == PAGE_SHIFT)
> > -             return vmap_small_pages_range_noflush(addr, end, prot, pages);
> > +     if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC))
> > +             page_shift = PAGE_SHIFT;
> >
> > -     for (i = 0; i < nr; i += 1U << (page_shift - PAGE_SHIFT)) {
> > -             int err;
> > -
> > -             err = vmap_range_noflush(addr, addr + (1UL << page_shift),
> > -                                     page_to_phys(pages[i]), prot,
> > -                                     page_shift);
> > -             if (err)
> > -                     return err;
> > -
> > -             addr += 1UL << page_shift;
> > -     }
> > -
> > -     return 0;
> > +     return vmap_pages_range_noflush_walk(addr, end, prot, pages,
> > +                     min(page_shift, PMD_SHIFT));
>
>
> We can easily extend to PUD huge mappings right? Not sure whether we
> should keep everything symmetric to how vmap_range_noflush() operates
> right now, since P4D mappings don't exist, but PUD looks worthwhile.
>

PUD mapping requires 1GB of contiguous physical memory, but the buddy
allocator's MAX_PAGE_ORDER is 10 (4MB on 4K pages). So page_shift
passed to vmap_pages_range_noflush_walk() never exceeds PMD_SHIFT.

Thanks,
Wen
> >  }
> >
> >  int vmap_pages_range_noflush(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list