[PATCH v2 0/2] watchdog: sama5d4_wdt: Fix WDDIS handling for SAM9X60 and SAMA7G5

[Balakrishnan.S at microchip.com]

Hi Wim,

Gentle ping — both patches have been reviewed. Could this be queued for 
the next cycle?

Thanks,
Balakrishnan

On 02/03/26 5:03 pm, Balakrishnan Sambath wrote:
> The sama5d4_wdt driver hardcodes AT91_WDT_WDDIS (bit 15) for WDDIS
> detection, which is incorrect for SAM9X60 and SAMA7G5 that use bit 12
> (AT91_SAM9X60_WDDIS). This series fixes the detection by introducing
> a per-device wddis_mask and documents the bit position difference in
> the header.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Reorder patches: fix first, documentation second
> - Drop patch 3/3, not needed with wddis_mask approach
> - Keep AT91_SAM9X60_* register names, drop _LEGACY/_MODERN naming
> - Limit header changes to WDDIS comments and datasheet references
> 
> Balakrishnan Sambath (2):
>    watchdog: sama5d4_wdt: Fix WDDIS detection on SAM9X60 and SAMA7G5
>    watchdog: at91sam9_wdt.h: Document WDDIS bit position per SoC family
> 
>   drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.h |  6 +++--
>   drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c  | 48 +++++++++++++++------------------
>   2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>