[PATCH 2/3] crypto: inside-secure: add EIP93 ESP packet backend

[Simon Horman]

On Sat, May 23, 2026 at 09:15:21PM +0900, Jihong Min wrote:
> Expose an EIP93 packet-mode IPsec backend for netdev drivers that need
> ESP encapsulation and decapsulation offload without advertising EIP93
> itself as a netdev.
> 
> Add provider selection, capability reporting, SA lifecycle management,
> IPsec request completion, and provider fault notification around the
> existing EIP93 descriptor path.
> 
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.5
> Signed-off-by: Jihong Min <hurryman2212 at gmail.com>

...

> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/eip93/eip93-ipsec.c b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/eip93/eip93-ipsec.c

...

> +static void eip93_ipsec_abort_requests(struct eip93_ipsec *ipsec, int err)
> +{
> +	struct eip93_ipsec_sa *sa;
> +
> +	while (true) {
> +		bool found = false;
> +
> +		spin_lock_bh(&ipsec->lock);
> +		list_for_each_entry(sa, &ipsec->sa_list, node) {
> +			spin_lock(&sa->lock);
> +			if (sa->aborting) {
> +				spin_unlock(&sa->lock);
> +				continue;
> +			}
> +
> +			sa->aborting = true;
> +			found = refcount_inc_not_zero(&sa->refcnt);
> +			spin_unlock(&sa->lock);
> +			if (found)
> +				break;
> +		}
> +		spin_unlock_bh(&ipsec->lock);
> +		if (!found)
> +			return;
> +
> +		eip93_ipsec_abort_sa(sa, err);
> +		eip93_ipsec_sa_put(sa);

sa is the iterator for the list_for_each_entry loop.
However, here it is used outside of that context.

	"If list_for_each_entry, etc complete a traversal of the list, the
	iterator variable ends up pointing to an address at an offset from
	the list head, and not a meaningful structure.  Thus this value
	should not be used after the end of the iterator.

	https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-kernel-janitors/msg11994.html

Flagged by Coccinelle.

> +	}
> +}

...