[PATCH RFC v2 0/2] arm64: vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock()
André Almeida
andrealmeid at igalia.com
Fri May 22 15:11:07 PDT 2026
Hi Sebastian,
Em 28/04/2026 08:00, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior escreveu:
> On 2026-04-24 15:55:59 [-0300], André Almeida wrote:
>> Hi folks,
> Hi,
>
>> This is my take on implementing the new vDSO for unlocking a robust futex in
>> arm64. If you don't know what's that, Thomas wrote a good summary,
>> including the motivation for this work and the x86 implementation:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/878qb89g7b.ffs@tglx/
>>
>> There are some loose ends in my patchset so I'm sending as a RFC to ask
>> some questions:
>>
>> - If the process is interrupted between the labels, we need to check the
>> conditional flags and clear the op_pending address from the register. Using
>> objdump I see that op_pending addr is being stored at x2, but I suspect that
>> this isn't stable, so I need to figure out how to make sure that the address
>> will always be stored in the same register.
>> - So far I have implemented only the LL/SC version to make review easier, but I
>> can do the LSE version as well.
>
> I am a bit behind here. In the meantime, were you able to check it with
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260404093939.7XgeW_54@linutronix.de/
> ?
Sorry for my delay. Yes, I had to do some modifications for the test
(will reply to your patch) and spot one error in my patch, and now the
test passes, thanks! Will send a v3 for this soon.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list