[PATCH] arm64: tlb: Flush walk cache when unsharing PMD tables
Zeng Heng
zengheng at huaweicloud.com
Thu May 21 22:32:07 PDT 2026
On 2026/5/21 23:15, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 04:05:07PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> + David H.
>>
>> On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 03:30:11PM +0800, Zeng Heng wrote:
>>> From: Zeng Heng <zengheng4 at huawei.com>
>>>
>>> When huge_pmd_unshare() is called to unshare a PMD table, the
>>> tlb_unshare_pmd_ptdesc() function sets tlb->unshared_tables=true
>>> but the aarch64 tlb_flush() only checked tlb->freed_tables to
>>> determine whether to use TLBF_NONE (vae1is, invalidates walk
>>> cache) or TLBF_NOWALKCACHE (vale1is, leaf-only).
>>>
>>> This caused the stale PMD page table entry to remain in the walk cache
>>> after unshare, potentially leading to incorrect page table walks.
>>>
>>> Fix by including unshared_tables in the check, so that when
>>> unsharing tables, TLBF_NONE is used and the walk cache is properly
>>> invalidated.
>>>
>>> Here is the detailed distinction between vae1is and vale1is:
>>>
>>> | Instruction Combination | Actual Invalidation Scope |
>>> | ------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------|
>>> | `VAE1IS` + TTL=`0` | All entries at all levels (full invalidation) |
>>> | `VAE1IS` + TTL=`2` (L2) | Non-leaf at Level 0/1 + leaf at Level 2 |
>>> | `VALE1IS` + TTL=`0` | Leaf entries at all levels (non-leaf not cleared) |
>>> | `VALE1IS` + TTL=`2` (L2) | Leaf entry at Level 2 only |
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4 at huawei.com>
>> The fix looks fine but does it need:
>>
>> Fixes: 8ce720d5bd91 ("mm/hugetlb: fix excessive IPI broadcasts when unsharing PMD tables using mmu_gather")
>> Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org>
>>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
>>> index 10869d7731b8..751bd57bc3ba 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
>>> @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ static inline int tlb_get_level(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
>>> static inline void tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
>>> {
>>> struct vm_area_struct vma = TLB_FLUSH_VMA(tlb->mm, 0);
>>> - tlbf_t flags = tlb->freed_tables ? TLBF_NONE : TLBF_NOWALKCACHE;
>>> + tlbf_t flags = (tlb->freed_tables || tlb->unshared_tables) ?
>>> + TLBF_NONE : TLBF_NOWALKCACHE;
>>> unsigned long stride = tlb_get_unmap_size(tlb);
>>> int tlb_level = tlb_get_level(tlb);
> Do we need this as well?
The proposed fix has been validated against the issue scenarios and
works as expected.
Per the ARM Architecture Reference Manual, whether only the last-level
page table entry is invalidated is determined by the instruction used
(vale1is for leaf entry only, vae1is for walk cache including leaf entry
and
non-leaf entry), rather than the TTL field. The TTL field merely specifies
which level the leaf entry belongs to.
Setting TTL to 0 always works fine, however, hardware must assume that
the entry can be from any level.[1][2]
[1]: vae1is instruction introduction by ARM spec,
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0601/2026-03/AArch64-Instructions/TLBI-VAE1IS--TLBI-VAE1ISNXS--TLB-Invalidate-by-VA--EL1--Inner-Shareable
[2]: rvae1is instruction introduction by ARM spec,
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0601/2026-03/AArch64-Instructions/TLBI-RVAE1IS--TLBI-RVAE1ISNXS--TLB-Range-Invalidate-by-VA--EL1--Inner-Shareable?lang=en
Best regards,
Zeng Heng
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
> index 10869d7731b8..3f4ab38cfd6e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static void tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb);
> static inline int tlb_get_level(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
> {
> /* The TTL field is only valid for the leaf entry. */
> - if (tlb->freed_tables)
> + if (tlb->freed_tables || tlb->unshared_tables)
> return TLBI_TTL_UNKNOWN;
>
> if (tlb->cleared_ptes && !(tlb->cleared_pmds ||
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list