[PATCH] arm64: tlb: Flush walk cache when unsharing PMD tables

Zeng Heng zengheng at huaweicloud.com
Thu May 21 22:32:07 PDT 2026



On 2026/5/21 23:15, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 04:05:07PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> + David H.
>>
>> On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 03:30:11PM +0800, Zeng Heng wrote:
>>> From: Zeng Heng <zengheng4 at huawei.com>
>>>
>>> When huge_pmd_unshare() is called to unshare a PMD table, the
>>> tlb_unshare_pmd_ptdesc() function sets tlb->unshared_tables=true
>>> but the aarch64 tlb_flush() only checked tlb->freed_tables to
>>> determine whether to use TLBF_NONE (vae1is, invalidates walk
>>> cache) or TLBF_NOWALKCACHE (vale1is, leaf-only).
>>>
>>> This caused the stale PMD page table entry to remain in the walk cache
>>> after unshare, potentially leading to incorrect page table walks.
>>>
>>> Fix by including unshared_tables in the check, so that when
>>> unsharing tables, TLBF_NONE is used and the walk cache is properly
>>> invalidated.
>>>
>>> Here is the detailed distinction between vae1is and vale1is:
>>>
>>> | Instruction Combination  | Actual Invalidation Scope                         |
>>> | ------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------|
>>> | `VAE1IS`  + TTL=`0`      | All entries at all levels (full invalidation)     |
>>> | `VAE1IS`  + TTL=`2` (L2) | Non-leaf at Level 0/1 + leaf at Level 2           |
>>> | `VALE1IS` + TTL=`0`      | Leaf entries at all levels (non-leaf not cleared) |
>>> | `VALE1IS` + TTL=`2` (L2) | Leaf entry at Level 2 only                        |
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4 at huawei.com>
>> The fix looks fine but does it need:
>>
>> Fixes: 8ce720d5bd91 ("mm/hugetlb: fix excessive IPI broadcasts when unsharing PMD tables using mmu_gather")
>> Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org>
>>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h | 3 ++-
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
>>> index 10869d7731b8..751bd57bc3ba 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
>>> @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ static inline int tlb_get_level(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
>>>   static inline void tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
>>>   {
>>>   	struct vm_area_struct vma = TLB_FLUSH_VMA(tlb->mm, 0);
>>> -	tlbf_t flags = tlb->freed_tables ? TLBF_NONE : TLBF_NOWALKCACHE;
>>> +	tlbf_t flags = (tlb->freed_tables || tlb->unshared_tables) ?
>>> +			TLBF_NONE : TLBF_NOWALKCACHE;
>>>   	unsigned long stride = tlb_get_unmap_size(tlb);
>>>   	int tlb_level = tlb_get_level(tlb);
> Do we need this as well?

The proposed fix has been validated against the issue scenarios and
works as expected.

Per the ARM Architecture Reference Manual, whether only the last-level
page table entry is invalidated is determined by the instruction used
(vale1is for leaf entry only, vae1is for walk cache including leaf entry 
and
non-leaf entry), rather than the TTL field. The TTL field merely specifies
which level the leaf entry belongs to.

Setting TTL to 0 always works fine, however, hardware must assume that
the entry can be from any level.[1][2]


[1]: vae1is instruction introduction by ARM spec,
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0601/2026-03/AArch64-Instructions/TLBI-VAE1IS--TLBI-VAE1ISNXS--TLB-Invalidate-by-VA--EL1--Inner-Shareable
[2]: rvae1is instruction introduction by ARM spec,
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0601/2026-03/AArch64-Instructions/TLBI-RVAE1IS--TLBI-RVAE1ISNXS--TLB-Range-Invalidate-by-VA--EL1--Inner-Shareable?lang=en


Best regards,
Zeng Heng


>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
> index 10869d7731b8..3f4ab38cfd6e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static void tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb);
>   static inline int tlb_get_level(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
>   {
>   	/* The TTL field is only valid for the leaf entry. */
> -	if (tlb->freed_tables)
> +	if (tlb->freed_tables || tlb->unshared_tables)
>   		return TLBI_TTL_UNKNOWN;
>   
>   	if (tlb->cleared_ptes && !(tlb->cleared_pmds ||




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list