[PATCH 3/4] remoteproc: add helper for optional ELF resource tables
Daniel Baluta
daniel.baluta at oss.nxp.com
Tue May 12 23:30:56 PDT 2026
On 5/12/26 17:53, Shah, Tanmay wrote:
>
>
> On 5/12/2026 2:55 AM, Daniel Baluta wrote:
>> On 5/12/26 00:18, Ben Levinsky wrote:
>>> [You don't often get email from ben.levinsky at amd.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>>
>>> Add a small helper around rproc_elf_load_rsc_table() for remoteproc
>>> drivers that treat a missing ELF resource table as optional. The helper
>>> returns success on -EINVAL and propagates other failures unchanged.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky at amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 12 ++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>>> index 3724a47a9748..dff87e468837 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>>> @@ -146,6 +146,18 @@ static inline int rproc_mem_entry_iounmap(struct rproc *rproc,
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static inline int rproc_elf_load_rsc_table_optional(struct rproc *rproc,
>>> + const struct firmware *fw)
>>> +{
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
>>> + if (ret == -EINVAL)
>>> + dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found\n");
>>
>> You are changing loglevel here. Initial drivers use dev_info or dev_warn. At least I'm used
>> with seeing this messages in the logs.
>>
>> So, what do you think on adding at least dev_info to this instead of dev_dbg?
>>
>
> Actually can we leave that choice to the platform driver ? There are
> many use cases where the remoteproc subsystem is used to load and start
> the remote core and the firmware doesn't have the resource table. We
> don't want to make info level log for such use cases, as the resource
> table is not expected in the first place there.
Agree, this is the best way to go.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list