[PATCH v3 3/7] gpio: regmap: Add gpio_regmap_operation and write-enable support
Jonathan Cameron
jic23 at kernel.org
Tue May 12 07:37:45 PDT 2026
On Tue, 12 May 2026 11:33:13 +0800
Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor.lin at realtek.com> wrote:
> Extend the reg_mask_xlate callback with an operation type parameter
> (gpio_regmap_operation) to allow drivers to return different
> register/mask combinations for different GPIO operations.
>
> Also add write-enable mechanism for hardware that requires setting a
> write-enable bit before modifying GPIO control registers.
>
> Consequently, update all existing drivers utilizing the gpio-regmap
> framework (across drivers/gpio, drivers/iio, and drivers/pinctrl)
> to accommodate the new reg_mask_xlate function signature.
What is the reasoning behind setting *mask = 0 for unsupported operations?
If it is a special value why not just return an error code to indicate
not supported? This seems to come from the assumption that you will want
to | that with masks for another operation.
I'm coming into this late but to me there look to be a bunch of undocumented
assumptions. Why do the operations have to share a register for example?
Perhaps an interface where you provide a single operation for write_enable
and whatever else and hence t here is only one 'reg' would work better?
>
> Suggested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor.lin at realtek.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c
> index deb9eebb58de..c76eef20e412 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c
> @@ -38,9 +38,10 @@ struct gpio_regmap {
> struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_chip_data;
> #endif
>
> - int (*reg_mask_xlate)(struct gpio_regmap *gpio, unsigned int base,
> - unsigned int offset, unsigned int *reg,
> - unsigned int *mask);
> + int (*reg_mask_xlate)(struct gpio_regmap *gpio,
> + enum gpio_regmap_operation op,
> + unsigned int base, unsigned int offset,
> + unsigned int *reg, unsigned int *mask);
>
> void *driver_data;
> };
> @@ -54,6 +55,7 @@ static unsigned int gpio_regmap_addr(unsigned int addr)
> }
>
> static int gpio_regmap_simple_xlate(struct gpio_regmap *gpio,
> + enum gpio_regmap_operation op,
> unsigned int base, unsigned int offset,
> unsigned int *reg, unsigned int *mask)
> {
> @@ -61,7 +63,16 @@ static int gpio_regmap_simple_xlate(struct gpio_regmap *gpio,
> unsigned int stride = offset / gpio->ngpio_per_reg;
>
> *reg = base + stride * gpio->reg_stride;
> - *mask = BIT(line);
> +
> + switch (op) {
> + case GPIO_REGMAP_SET_WREN_OP:
> + case GPIO_REGMAP_SET_DIR_WREN_OP:
> + *mask = 0;
> + break;
> + default:
> + *mask = BIT(line);
> + break;
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -69,7 +80,7 @@ static int gpio_regmap_simple_xlate(struct gpio_regmap *gpio,
> static int gpio_regmap_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> {
> struct gpio_regmap *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> - unsigned int base, val, reg, mask;
> + unsigned int base, val, reg, mask, dir_mask;
> int ret;
>
> /* we might not have an output register if we are input only */
> @@ -78,10 +89,24 @@ static int gpio_regmap_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> else
> base = gpio_regmap_addr(gpio->reg_set_base);
>
> - ret = gpio->reg_mask_xlate(gpio, base, offset, ®, &mask);
> + ret = gpio->reg_mask_xlate(gpio, GPIO_REGMAP_GET_OP, base, offset, ®, &dir_mask);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + ret = regmap_read(gpio->regmap, reg, &val);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (val & dir_mask) {
> + ret = gpio->reg_mask_xlate(gpio, GPIO_REGMAP_OUT, base, offset, ®, &mask);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + } else {
> + ret = gpio->reg_mask_xlate(gpio, GPIO_REGMAP_IN, base, offset, ®, &mask);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> /* ensure we don't spoil any register cache with pin input values */
> if (gpio->reg_dat_base == gpio->reg_set_base)
> ret = regmap_read_bypassed(gpio->regmap, reg, &val);
> @@ -98,10 +123,14 @@ static int gpio_regmap_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
> {
> struct gpio_regmap *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> unsigned int base = gpio_regmap_addr(gpio->reg_set_base);
> - unsigned int reg, mask, mask_val;
> + unsigned int reg, mask, mask_val, wren_mask;
> int ret;
>
> - ret = gpio->reg_mask_xlate(gpio, base, offset, ®, &mask);
> + ret = gpio->reg_mask_xlate(gpio, GPIO_REGMAP_SET_WREN_OP, base, offset, ®, &wren_mask);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = gpio->reg_mask_xlate(gpio, GPIO_REGMAP_SET_OP, base, offset, ®, &mask);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -112,9 +141,9 @@ static int gpio_regmap_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
>
> /* ignore input values which shadow the old output value */
> if (gpio->reg_dat_base == gpio->reg_set_base)
> - ret = regmap_write_bits(gpio->regmap, reg, mask, mask_val);
> + ret = regmap_write_bits(gpio->regmap, reg, mask | wren_mask, mask_val | wren_mask);
> else
> - ret = regmap_update_bits(gpio->regmap, reg, mask, mask_val);
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(gpio->regmap, reg, mask | wren_mask, mask_val | wren_mask);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -123,7 +152,7 @@ static int gpio_regmap_set_with_clear(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> unsigned int offset, int val)
> {
> struct gpio_regmap *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> - unsigned int base, reg, mask;
> + unsigned int base, reg, mask, wren_mask;
> int ret;
>
> if (val)
> @@ -131,11 +160,15 @@ static int gpio_regmap_set_with_clear(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> else
> base = gpio_regmap_addr(gpio->reg_clr_base);
>
> - ret = gpio->reg_mask_xlate(gpio, base, offset, ®, &mask);
> + ret = gpio->reg_mask_xlate(gpio, GPIO_REGMAP_SET_WREN_OP, base, offset, ®, &wren_mask);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - return regmap_write(gpio->regmap, reg, mask);
> + ret = gpio->reg_mask_xlate(gpio, GPIO_REGMAP_SET_WITH_CLEAR_OP, base, offset, ®, &mask);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return regmap_write(gpio->regmap, reg, mask | wren_mask);
> }
>
> static int gpio_regmap_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> @@ -167,7 +200,7 @@ static int gpio_regmap_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> return -ENOTSUPP;
> }
>
> - ret = gpio->reg_mask_xlate(gpio, base, offset, ®, &mask);
> + ret = gpio->reg_mask_xlate(gpio, GPIO_REGMAP_GET_DIR_OP, base, offset, ®, &mask);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -185,7 +218,7 @@ static int gpio_regmap_set_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> unsigned int offset, bool output)
> {
> struct gpio_regmap *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> - unsigned int base, val, reg, mask;
> + unsigned int base, val, reg, mask, wren_mask;
> int invert, ret;
>
> if (gpio->reg_dir_out_base) {
> @@ -198,7 +231,12 @@ static int gpio_regmap_set_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> return -ENOTSUPP;
> }
>
> - ret = gpio->reg_mask_xlate(gpio, base, offset, ®, &mask);
> + ret = gpio->reg_mask_xlate(gpio, GPIO_REGMAP_SET_DIR_OP, base, offset, ®, &mask);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = gpio->reg_mask_xlate(gpio, GPIO_REGMAP_SET_DIR_WREN_OP, base, offset, ®,
> + &wren_mask);
What constrains these two to provide the same value back for reg?
To me it seems like the write enable might well be in a different register.
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -207,7 +245,7 @@ static int gpio_regmap_set_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> else
> val = output ? mask : 0;
>
> - return regmap_update_bits(gpio->regmap, reg, mask, val);
> + return regmap_update_bits(gpio->regmap, reg, mask | wren_mask, val | wren_mask);
> }
>
> static int gpio_regmap_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list