[PATCH] drivers: altera_edac: Guard SDRAM irq2 retrieval for Arria10 only

[Dinh Nguyen]

On 5/11/26 20:37, Nazle Asmade, Muhammad Nazim Amirul wrote:
> On 11/5/2026 7:54 pm, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/8/26 02:52, muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade at altera.com wrote:
>>> From: Nazim Amirul <muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade at altera.com>
>>>
>>> Guard the irq2 retrieval with an of_machine_is_compatible() check so
>>> that platform_get_irq(pdev, 1) is only called on Arria10 platforms.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nazim Amirul
>>> <muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade at altera.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Niravkumar L Rabara <nirav.rabara at altera.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/edac/altera_edac.c | 3 ++-
>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
>>> index 4edd2088c2db..b30302198cd4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
>>> @@ -348,7 +348,8 @@ static int altr_sdram_probe(struct platform_device
>>> *pdev)
>>>        }
>>>        /* Arria10 has a 2nd IRQ */
>>> -    irq2 = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
>>> +    if (of_machine_is_compatible("altr,socfpga-arria10"))
>>> +        irq2 = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
>>>        layers[0].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHIP_SELECT;
>>>        layers[0].size = 1;
>>
>> Why? We already switch on arria10 later in the same function.
>>
>> Sorry, but NAK.
>>
>> Dinh
> This driver were used by cyclone5 and arria10. Cyclone5 only has one
> interrupt whereby arria10 has 2 interrupt. That is the reason why the
> interrupt was guard by (of_machine_is_compatible("altr,socfpga-arria10"))
> 

Yes, but look at line 397,

       	/* Only the Arria10 has separate IRQs */
         if (of_machine_is_compatible("altr,socfpga-arria10")) {
                 /* Arria10 specific initialization */

Dinh