[PATCH v19 0/7] ring-buffer: Making persistent ring buffers robust

Steven Rostedt rostedt at kernel.org
Mon May 11 09:29:43 PDT 2026


On Thu, 7 May 2026 13:14:16 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat at kernel.org> wrote:

> > I'll test this some more, and make a proper patch.  
> 
> Ah, indeed. Thanks for fixing!
> 
> BTW, shouldn't we unify common logic of those functions?

Hmm, there's not much common between the two. One is a consuming read and
the other is a non-consuming read that needs to test for a bunch of race
conditions.

If you see something that can be shared, I'm all for it.

-- Steve



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list