[PATCH v19 0/7] ring-buffer: Making persistent ring buffers robust
Steven Rostedt
rostedt at kernel.org
Mon May 11 09:29:43 PDT 2026
On Thu, 7 May 2026 13:14:16 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat at kernel.org> wrote:
> > I'll test this some more, and make a proper patch.
>
> Ah, indeed. Thanks for fixing!
>
> BTW, shouldn't we unify common logic of those functions?
Hmm, there's not much common between the two. One is a consuming read and
the other is a non-consuming read that needs to test for a bunch of race
conditions.
If you see something that can be shared, I'm all for it.
-- Steve
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list