[PATCH] media: dt-bindings: nxp,imx8mq-mipi-csi2: Fix example endpoint label typo

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 06/05/2026 16:30, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 04:24:35PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 06/05/2026 16:21, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 03:33:57PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 06/05/2026 11:01, Robby Cai wrote:
>>>>> The example in imx8mq-mipi-csi2.yaml uses imx8mm_mipi_csi_{in,out} endpoint
>>>>> labels, which is confusing for an i.MX8MQ binding. Rename the labels to
>>>>> imx8mq_mipi_csi_{in,out} for consistency.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 37255747ecbd ("media: dt-bindings: media: document the nxp,imx8mq-mipi-csi2 receiver phy and controller")
>>>>
>>>> Nothing to fix here. Otherwise explain the bug.
>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Robby Cai <robby.cai at nxp.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/media/nxp,imx8mq-mipi-csi2.yaml       | 4 ++--
>>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/nxp,imx8mq-mipi-csi2.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/nxp,imx8mq-mipi-csi2.yaml
>>>>> index 4fcfc4fd3565..71f79651dd96 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/nxp,imx8mq-mipi-csi2.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/nxp,imx8mq-mipi-csi2.yaml
>>>>> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ examples:
>>>>>              port at 0 {
>>>>>                  reg = <0>;
>>>>>  
>>>>> -                imx8mm_mipi_csi_in: endpoint {
>>>>> +                imx8mq_mipi_csi_in: endpoint {
>>>>
>>>> Drop the labels instead - they are not used.
>>>
>>> I think the label has value, it improves readability of the example by
>>> making the purpose of the endpoints more explicit. I won't fight for it
>>> though, I know it's hard to change your mind.
>>
>> Then should not have imx8mq in the first place. The only information
>> coming here is that it is input endpoint. IMO it is close to obvious
>> from the opposite of "remote-endpoint = <&imx477_out>;" (if remote is
>> OUT, then this must be IN). But keeping the redundant data or actually
>> correcting wrong redundant data into correct redundant data, is still
>> undesirable. Such patterns then keep spreading to new code.
> 
> Dropping the imx8mm_ prefix instead of renaming it is a good idea,
> thanks for proposing it. As for the Fixes: tag, I don't see a need to
> backport this, so I'd leave it out too.

Fixes is not only for backporting but indicating that there was a bug,
being fixed here. For example for stats. There was no bug, because DTS
example absolutely does not matter - it's example code - therefore
redundant incorrect information in label matters even less.

Best regards,
Krzysztof