[PATCH v5 11/12] powercap: arm_scmi: Add get_power_uw to synthetic node

[Cristian Marussi]

On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 10:09:20AM +0100, Philip Radford wrote:
> Exposes the current power usage from the immediate children of
> the synthetic (root) powercap node. Iterates over pr->spzones and
> sums per-zone power.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philip Radford <philip.radford at arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/powercap/arm_scmi_powercap.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/powercap/arm_scmi_powercap.c b/drivers/powercap/arm_scmi_powercap.c
> index d74869af1633..81b5214acda4 100644
> --- a/drivers/powercap/arm_scmi_powercap.c
> +++ b/drivers/powercap/arm_scmi_powercap.c
> @@ -270,9 +270,34 @@ static int instance_root_release(struct powercap_zone *pz)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int instance_root_get_power_uw(struct powercap_zone *pz, u64 *v)
> +static int instance_root_get_power_uw(struct powercap_zone *pz, u64 *power_uw)
>  {
> -	*v = 0;
> +	struct scmi_powercap_zone *root = to_scmi_powercap_zone(pz);
> +	struct scmi_powercap_zone *child;
> +	struct scmi_powercap_root *pr;
> +	u64 acc = 0;
> +	u64 p;

These u64 can live on a single line...

> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!pz || !power_uw)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	pr = container_of(root, struct scmi_powercap_root, instance_root);

usually we define macros to wrap this like to_scmi_powercap_zone()...
...even if used only once...this could be a new to_scmi_powercap_root()

> +	if (!pr)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(child, &pr->registered_zones[0], node) {
> +		if (child == &pr->instance_root)
> +			continue;

You'll need to check this in light of the fixes of previous patch

> +
> +		ret = scmi_powercap_get_power_uw(&child->zone, &p);
> +		if (!ret)
> +			acc += p;
> +		else
> +			dev_dbg(child->dev, "Failed to read child power: %u\n", ret);
> +	}
> +
> +	*power_uw = acc;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  

Thanks,
Cristian