[PATCH] clk: visconti: pll: use kzalloc_flex

nobuhiro.iwamatsu.x90 at mail.toshiba nobuhiro.iwamatsu.x90 at mail.toshiba
Mon Mar 30 18:05:49 PDT 2026


Hi Rosen,

Thanks for your patch.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rosen Penev <rosenp at gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 1:23 PM
> To: linux-clk at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette at baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org>; iwamatsu nobuhiro(岩松 信洋
> □DITC○CPT) <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.x90 at mail.toshiba>; Kees Cook <kees at kernel.org>; Gustavo A. R. Silva
> <gustavoars at kernel.org>; moderated list:ARM/TOSHIBA VISCONTI ARCHITECTURE
> <linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org>; open list <linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org>; open list:KERNEL HARDENING (not
> covered by other areas):Keyword:\b__counted_by(_le|_be)?\b <linux-hardening at vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: [PATCH] clk: visconti: pll: use kzalloc_flex
> 
> Simplify allocation by using a flexible array member and kzalloc_flex.
> 
> Add __counted_by for extra runtime analysis. Assign after allocation as required by __counted_by.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp at gmail.com>

Acked-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.x90 at mail.toshiba>

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro
> ---
>  drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c | 17 +++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c b/drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c index 6fd02c4b641e..ca29d12f9316 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c
> @@ -21,9 +21,9 @@ struct visconti_pll {
>  	void __iomem	*pll_base;
>  	spinlock_t	*lock;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> -	const struct visconti_pll_rate_table *rate_table;
>  	size_t rate_count;
>  	struct visconti_pll_provider *ctx;
> +	struct visconti_pll_rate_table rate_table[] __counted_by(rate_count);
>  };
> 
>  #define PLL_CONF_REG		0x0000
> @@ -255,10 +255,6 @@ static struct clk_hw *visconti_register_pll(struct visconti_pll_provider *ctx,
>  	size_t len;
>  	int ret;
> 
> -	pll = kzalloc_obj(*pll);
> -	if (!pll)
> -		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> -
>  	init.name = name;
>  	init.flags = CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED;
>  	init.parent_names = &parent_name;
> @@ -266,11 +262,13 @@ static struct clk_hw *visconti_register_pll(struct visconti_pll_provider *ctx,
> 
>  	for (len = 0; rate_table[len].rate != 0; )
>  		len++;
> +
> +	pll = kzalloc_flex(*pll, rate_table, len);
> +	if (!pll)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
>  	pll->rate_count = len;
> -	pll->rate_table = kmemdup_array(rate_table,
> -					pll->rate_count, sizeof(*pll->rate_table),
> -					GFP_KERNEL);
> -	WARN(!pll->rate_table, "%s: could not allocate rate table for %s\n", __func__, name);
> +	memcpy(pll->rate_table, rate_table, len * sizeof(*pll->rate_table));
> 
>  	init.ops = &visconti_pll_ops;
>  	pll->hw.init = &init;
> @@ -282,7 +280,6 @@ static struct clk_hw *visconti_register_pll(struct visconti_pll_provider *ctx,
>  	ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &pll->hw);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		pr_err("failed to register pll clock %s : %d\n", name, ret);
> -		kfree(pll->rate_table);
>  		kfree(pll);
>  		pll_hw_clk = ERR_PTR(ret);
>  	}
> --
> 2.53.0





More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list