[PATCH 12/15] KVM: arm64: Remove evaluation of timer state in kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer()

[Marc Zyngier]

The vgic-v5 code added some evaluations of the timers in a helper funtion
(kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer()) that is called to determine whether
the vcpu can wake-up.

But looking at the timer there is wrong:

- we want to see timers that are signalling an interrupt to the
  vcpu, and not just that have a pending interrupt

- we already have kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable() that evaluates the
  state of interrupts

- kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer() really is about WFIT, as the timeout
  does not generate an interrupt, and is therefore distinct from
  the point above

As a consequence, revert these changes.

Fixes: 9491c63b6cd7b ("KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Enlighten arch timer for GICv5")
Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260319154937.3619520-1-sascha.bischoff%40arm.com
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c | 6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
index 37279f8748695..6608c47d1f628 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
@@ -402,11 +402,7 @@ static bool kvm_timer_should_fire(struct arch_timer_context *timer_ctx)
 
 int kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	struct arch_timer_context *vtimer = vcpu_vtimer(vcpu);
-	struct arch_timer_context *ptimer = vcpu_ptimer(vcpu);
-
-	return kvm_timer_should_fire(vtimer) || kvm_timer_should_fire(ptimer) ||
-	       (vcpu_has_wfit_active(vcpu) && wfit_delay_ns(vcpu) == 0);
+	return vcpu_has_wfit_active(vcpu) && wfit_delay_ns(vcpu) == 0;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.47.3