[PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: dma: arm-dma350: document generic and combined IRQ topologies

[Jun Guo]

Hi Krzysztof,

On 3/20/2026 6:04 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL
> 
> On 20/03/2026 10:58, Peter Chen wrote:
>> On 26-03-20 10:43:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>>>
>>> On 20/03/2026 10:38, Peter Chen wrote:
>>>> On 26-03-20 10:12:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 06:17:21PM +0800, Jun Guo wrote:
>>>>>> Update the DMA-350 DT binding to match the current driver behavior.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Allow both:
>>>>>> - "arm,dma-350" as the generic compatible, and
>>>>>> - "cix,sky1-dma-350", "arm,dma-350" for SoC-specific fallback usage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also document interrupt topology variants supported by hardware
>>>>>> integration:
>>>>>> - one combined interrupt for all channels, or
>>>>>> - one interrupt per channel (up to 8 channels).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch is Assisted-by: Cursor: GPT-5.3 Codex.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wrong tag, please read carefully the guideline before using LLM tools.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>>
>>>> It is the trade off for coding-assistants.rst suggestion and
>>>> passing checkpatch.pl. Currently, checkpatch.pl reports the
>>>> error for tag without email address. So we choose to add tag
>>>> description at patch context.
>>>
>>> You still have to use correct tag.
>>
>> You mean even checkpatch.pl reports below error, we still add it
>> "Assisted-by: Cursor: GPT-5.3 Codex" as tag?
> 
> Yes, after fixing the contents (that's not entirely correct format I
> think). Hopefully someone will fix checkpatch one day...
I cannot find any commit records referencing AI via "Co-developed-by" in 
the latest kernel GitHub repository, and I also cannot locate any text 
describing the correct way to cite AI in the submitting-patches.rst 
file. In this case, how can I confirm the current correct format?
> 
>>
>> WARNING: Non-standard signature: Assisted-by:
>> #14:
>> Assisted-by: Cursor: GPT-5.3 Codex
>>
>> ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'Cursor: GPT-5.3 Codex'
>> #14:
>> Assisted-by: Cursor: GPT-5.3 Codex
>>
>>> You ignored rest of the email
>>> message, so I assume you agree that you should not send LLM microslop?
>>>
>>
>> I am not the patch author, Jun will reply it.
> 
> Ah, sorry, I did not notice that.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Best regards,
Jun