[PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Add ti,j722s-cpsw-nuss compatible

[Nora Schiffer]

On Wed, 2026-03-18 at 17:35 +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 03:05:25PM +0100, Nora Schiffer wrote:
> > The J722S CPSW3G is mostly identical to the AM64's, but additionally
> > supports SGMII.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nora Schiffer <nora.schiffer at ew.tq-group.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> > index a959c1d7e643a..9ab8237c7f79e 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> > @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ properties:
> >        - ti,j7200-cpswxg-nuss
> >        - ti,j721e-cpsw-nuss
> >        - ti,j721e-cpswxg-nuss
> > +      - ti,j722s-cpsw-nuss
> 
> For all these bindings, why is a fallback not suitable? Seems like it'd
> be possible here, since there's just a new feature. Is there some other
> programming model difference?

I think a fallback makes sense, I didn't add one because other variants derived
from the AM64 don't have one either. I can include a fallback in v2 (for all 3
bindings in this series).

Best,
Nora



> 
> >        - ti,j784s4-cpswxg-nuss
> >  
> >    reg:
> > -- 
> > TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
> > Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
> > Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
> > https://www.tq-group.com/
> > 

-- 
TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
https://www.tq-group.com/