[PATCH 11/17] KVM: arm64: Restrict the scope of the 'writable' attribute
Fuad Tabba
tabba at google.com
Tue Mar 17 06:55:09 PDT 2026
On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 at 17:55, Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> The 'writable' field is ambiguous, and indicates multiple things:
>
> - whether the underlying memslot is writable
>
> - whether we are resolving the fault with writable attributes
>
> Add a new field to kvm_s2_fault_vma_info (map_writable) to indicate
> the former condition, and have local writable variables to track
> the latter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
user_mem_abort() was overloading a lot of variables!
Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba at google.com>
Cheers,
/fuad
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index caa5bedc79e19..3cfb8f2a6d186 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1717,10 +1717,10 @@ struct kvm_s2_fault_vma_info {
> gfn_t gfn;
> bool mte_allowed;
> bool is_vma_cacheable;
> + bool map_writable;
> };
>
> struct kvm_s2_fault {
> - bool writable;
> bool s2_force_noncacheable;
> kvm_pfn_t pfn;
> bool force_pte;
> @@ -1801,7 +1801,7 @@ static int kvm_s2_fault_pin_pfn(const struct kvm_s2_fault_desc *s2fd,
>
> fault->pfn = __kvm_faultin_pfn(s2fd->memslot, get_canonical_gfn(s2fd, s2vi),
> kvm_is_write_fault(s2fd->vcpu) ? FOLL_WRITE : 0,
> - &fault->writable, &fault->page);
> + &s2vi->map_writable, &fault->page);
> if (unlikely(is_error_noslot_pfn(fault->pfn))) {
> if (fault->pfn == KVM_PFN_ERR_HWPOISON) {
> kvm_send_hwpoison_signal(s2fd->hva, __ffs(s2vi->vma_pagesize));
> @@ -1818,6 +1818,7 @@ static int kvm_s2_fault_compute_prot(const struct kvm_s2_fault_desc *s2fd,
> const struct kvm_s2_fault_vma_info *s2vi)
> {
> struct kvm *kvm = s2fd->vcpu->kvm;
> + bool writable = s2vi->map_writable;
>
> /*
> * Check if this is non-struct page memory PFN, and cannot support
> @@ -1857,7 +1858,7 @@ static int kvm_s2_fault_compute_prot(const struct kvm_s2_fault_desc *s2fd,
> * Only actually map the page as writable if this was a write
> * fault.
> */
> - fault->writable = false;
> + writable = false;
> }
>
> if (kvm_vcpu_trap_is_exec_fault(s2fd->vcpu) && fault->s2_force_noncacheable)
> @@ -1875,9 +1876,9 @@ static int kvm_s2_fault_compute_prot(const struct kvm_s2_fault_desc *s2fd,
> }
>
> if (s2fd->nested)
> - adjust_nested_fault_perms(s2fd->nested, &fault->prot, &fault->writable);
> + adjust_nested_fault_perms(s2fd->nested, &fault->prot, &writable);
>
> - if (fault->writable)
> + if (writable)
> fault->prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_W;
>
> if (kvm_vcpu_trap_is_exec_fault(s2fd->vcpu))
> @@ -1906,6 +1907,7 @@ static int kvm_s2_fault_map(const struct kvm_s2_fault_desc *s2fd,
> const struct kvm_s2_fault_vma_info *s2vi, void *memcache)
> {
> enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags flags = KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SHARED;
> + bool writable = fault->prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_W;
> struct kvm *kvm = s2fd->vcpu->kvm;
> struct kvm_pgtable *pgt;
> long perm_fault_granule;
> @@ -1966,11 +1968,11 @@ static int kvm_s2_fault_map(const struct kvm_s2_fault_desc *s2fd,
> }
>
> out_unlock:
> - kvm_release_faultin_page(kvm, fault->page, !!ret, fault->writable);
> + kvm_release_faultin_page(kvm, fault->page, !!ret, writable);
> kvm_fault_unlock(kvm);
>
> /* Mark the page dirty only if the fault is handled successfully */
> - if (fault->writable && !ret) {
> + if (writable && !ret) {
> phys_addr_t ipa = gfn_to_gpa(get_canonical_gfn(s2fd, s2vi));
> ipa &= ~(mapping_size - 1);
> mark_page_dirty_in_slot(kvm, s2fd->memslot, gpa_to_gfn(ipa));
> --
> 2.47.3
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list