REQUEST: Syncing tools/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h with the kernel sources

[Mark Rutland]

On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 09:43:44AM +0000, Leo Yan wrote:
> Hi Arnaldo,
> 
> [ + Mark ]
> 
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2026 at 10:43:03AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 	Can someone please address this perf build warning:
> > 
> >   make: Entering directory '/home/acme/git/perf-tools/tools/perf'
> >   BUILD:   Doing 'make -j32' parallel build
> > Warning: Kernel ABI header differences:
> >   diff -u tools/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
> > 
> > I tried updating that header and got the problems below.
> > 
> > I just merged perf-tools with upstream, will push to tmp.perf-tools at:
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools.git tmp.perf-tools
> > 
> > Thanks in advance,
> 
> Sorry that this issue has come up again.
> 
> A quick summary:
> 
> The plan was to extract the CPU ID definitions from cputype.h so that
> kernel and userspace can share the same definitions.  This would avoid
> keep syncing cputype.h between the kernel and userspace [1].
> 
> James worked on this a bit, and later Mark wanted to try a different
> implementation.  However, we haven't posted formal patches yet.
> 
> To avoid extra burden on perf maintainers, I suggest removing the
> cputype.h check in check-headers.sh.  In the short term, Arm developers
> will take responsibility for keeping it up to date.  In the long term,
> once the CPU ID refactoring is completed, we can do a proper cleanup of
> cputype.h.
> 
> James, Mark, is this reasonable?
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/aFJ8bQh_30JMzF_-@J2N7QTR9R3/

Removing the check sounds good to me; that's one of the options I
suggested in [1]:

| The simple solution for now is to *NOT* update the userspace header,
| and to stop warning that this has diverged from the kernel header. 

I think it's fine if we need to manually update that header when
teaching the perf tool about specific CPUs.

Are you happy to spin a patch to remove the check?

Mark.