[PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: fsl,irqsteer: add S32N79 support

[Ciprian Marian Costea]

On 3/5/2026 2:39 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/03/2026 13:25, Ciprian Marian Costea wrote:
>> On 3/5/2026 2:12 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 05/03/2026 13:02, Ciprian Marian Costea wrote:
>>>> On 2/26/2026 9:31 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 02:38:52PM +0100, Ciprian Costea wrote:
>>>>>> From: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea at oss.nxp.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add compatible string for the interrupt steering controller used in NXP
>>>>>> S32N79 SoC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The S32N79 SoC differs from the i.MX version by not implementing the
>>>>>> CHANCTRL register, but otherwise maintains the same programming model and
>>>>>> register layout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Co-developed-by: Larisa Grigore <larisa.grigore at nxp.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Larisa Grigore <larisa.grigore at nxp.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea at oss.nxp.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     .../devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/fsl,irqsteer.yaml   | 1 +
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/fsl,irqsteer.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/fsl,irqsteer.yaml
>>>>>> index 5c768c1e159c..caf3e4a1f26f 100644
>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/fsl,irqsteer.yaml
>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/fsl,irqsteer.yaml
>>>>>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ properties:
>>>>>>                   - fsl,imx94-irqsteer
>>>>>>                   - fsl,imx95-irqsteer
>>>>>>               - const: fsl,imx-irqsteer
>>>>>> +      - const: nxp,s32n79-irqsteer
>>>>>
>>>>> So that should be part of enum with the first entry.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello Krzysztof,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your review. Regarding this change, I was thinking since
>>>> S32N79 irqsteer does not implement the 'CHANCTRL' register, it should
>>>> not fallback to 'fsl,imx-irqsteer'. If the driver were to match on the
>>>> fallback compatible, it would attempt to write to the non-existent
>>>> CHANCTRL register.
>>>>
>>>> Am I wrong?
>>>
>>> No clue, I did not say anything about fallbacks.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>
>> Indeed, but your suggestion of moving 'nxp,s32n79-irqsteer' under the
>> enum would fallback on 'fsl,imx-irqsteer'.
>>
>> Am I misunderstanding your suggestion ?
> 
> Open the code. What is the first entry?
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Sorry, the enum reference confused me.

Is the following in accordance with your suggestion?

oneOf:
   - enum:
       - fsl,imx-irqsteer
       - nxp,s32n79-irqsteer
   - items:
       - enum:
           ...
       - const: fsl,imx-irqsteer

Best regards,
Ciprian