[PATCH v2 3/7] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add NXP S32N79 SoC and RDB board

[Ciprian Marian Costea]

On 2/26/2026 7:00 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/02/2026 16:17, Frank Li wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 08:32:16AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 02:38:54PM +0100, Ciprian Costea wrote:
>>>> From: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea at oss.nxp.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add device tree binding documentation for the NXP S32N79 automotive SoC
>>>> and the S32N79 Reference Design Board (S32N79-RDB).
>>>>
>>>> The S32N79 is an automotive-grade SoC featuring eight ARM Cortex-A78AE
>>>> cores organized for high-performance networking and gateway applications
>>>> in vehicles.
>>>>
>>>> Co-developed-by: Larisa Grigore <larisa.grigore at nxp.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Larisa Grigore <larisa.grigore at nxp.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea at oss.nxp.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 6 ++++++
>>>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>>> index 5716d701292c..415081423a30 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>>> @@ -1827,6 +1827,12 @@ properties:
>>>>                 - fsl,s32v234-evb           # S32V234-EVB2 Customer Evaluation Board
>>>>             - const: fsl,s32v234
>>>>
>>>> +      - description: S32N79 based Boards
>>>> +        items:
>>>> +          - enum:
>>>> +              - nxp,s32n79-rdb
>>>> +          - const: nxp,s32n79
>>>
>>> I believe these are ordered by fallback, so s32v > s32n.
>>
>> Previous use fsl,s32v234, now use nxp,s32n79, I suggest keep consistent
>> with existing one, use fsl,s32n79
>>
> 
> Ah, I missed that prefix is different! Well, that I don't mind, it's
> your call which prefix you want.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Ah, since they are ordered by fallback, I will keep 'nxp,s32n79*'.
Therefore, I will leave the order as is. S32N79 after S32V234.

Thanks,
Ciprian C