[PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a7-sk: Fix pinmux for pin M19 used by sdhci1

Judith Mendez jm at ti.com
Tue Mar 3 08:36:34 PST 2026


Hi Siddharth,

On 2/12/26 7:06 AM, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> According to the datasheet for the AM62Ax SoC [0], pin M19 has the address
> 0x000F40A8. Therefore, the offset to be passed to the AM62AX_IOPAD macro is
> 0xa8 and not 0x07c. With the existing incorrect offset, the following error
> is seen when Linux boots:
> 	fa00000.mmc: deferred probe pending: platform: supplier regulator-5 not ready
> with the SD Card being unusable and the boot process halting due to the root
> filesystem in the SD Card being inaccessible.
> 
> Hence, fix it.
> 
> [0]: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/am62a7.pdf
> 
> Fixes: 8f023012eb4a ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a: Enable UHS mode support for SD cards")
> Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli at ti.com>
> ---
> 
> Hello,
> 
> This patch is based on commit
> 37a93dd5c49b Merge tag 'net-next-7.0' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next
> of Mainline Linux.
> 
> Regards,
> Siddharth.
> 
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts
> index e99bdbc2e0cb..9cfe7e7b317b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts
> @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ AM62AX_IOPAD(0x01d4, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (C15) UART0_RTSn.GPIO1_23 */
>   
>   	vddshv_sdio_pins_default: vddshv-sdio-default-pins {
>   		pinctrl-single,pins = <
> -			AM62AX_IOPAD(0x07c, PIN_OUTPUT, 7) /* (M19) GPMC0_CLK.GPIO0_31 */
> +			AM62AX_IOPAD(0x0a8, PIN_OUTPUT, 7) /* (M19) GPMC0_CLK.GPIO0_31 */

What! I don't think this is right.

Looking at device tree, regulator-5 is using main_gpio0 31 to control SD
ENA with PMIC. Which is GPMC0_CLK (N22 pad) and VSEL_SD_SOC. Which is
0x000F407C address in the device datasheet. So as far as I can see, the
original address is correct and just the (M19) name is wrong. Did you
test this patch to see if that fixed the failure?

~ Judith



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list