[PATCH 2/6] ARM: move vmalloc() lazy-page table population

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

On 2026-03-02 11:19:52 [+0000], Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> We've gone from the code always having interrupts disabled, to your
> review response that always wants them to be enabled (which is what
> *un*conditionally enable interrupts means) to now conditionally enable
> interrupts.

I'm sorry but this got out of hand.
The wording was we must "not enable interrupts" and I was curious if
this is because we destroy some information (on the following fault/
interrupt) _or_ not. If we don't destroy anything then it would be okay
to enable them conditionally. At no point I am suggesting to do so.

Sorry for the confusion here.

Sebastian