[PATCH RFC v8 02/24] set_memory: Introduce set_memory_pkey() stub
David Hildenbrand (Arm)
david at kernel.org
Tue Jun 16 08:41:02 PDT 2026
On 5/26/26 13:15, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> Introduce a new function, set_memory_pkey(), which sets the
> protection key (pkey) of pages in the specified linear mapping
> range. Architectures implementing kernel pkeys (kpkeys) must
> provide a suitable implementation; an empty stub is added as
> fallback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky at arm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/set_memory.h | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/set_memory.h b/include/linux/set_memory.h
> index 3030d9245f5a..7b3a8bfde3c6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/set_memory.h
> +++ b/include/linux/set_memory.h
> @@ -84,4 +84,11 @@ static inline int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_KPKEYS
> +static inline int set_memory_pkey(unsigned long addr, int numpages, int pkey)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* _LINUX_SET_MEMORY_H_ */
>
This patch looks rather odd, given that this is just a stub that won't be used
before patch #20.
And there, it's only used from arm64 code? So why do we need the common-code stub?
--
Cheers,
David
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list