[PATCH] KVM: arm64: Sync SPSR_EL1 when injecting an exception into a pVM
Fuad Tabba
tabba at google.com
Mon Jun 15 08:03:17 PDT 2026
On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 at 15:42, Will Deacon <will at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 11:52:10AM +0100, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 at 11:05, Will Deacon <will at kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 12:34:14PM +0100, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> > > > When pKVM injects a synchronous exception into a protected guest, it
> > > > re-enters without restoring the guest's EL1 sysregs and writes the EL1
> > > > exception registers to hardware by hand: ESR_EL1 and ELR_EL1, but not
> > > > SPSR_EL1. enter_exception64() sets SPSR_EL1 (the interrupted PSTATE)
> > > > only in memory, so the guest's handler reads a stale SPSR_EL1 and
> > > > restores the wrong PSTATE on eret.
> > > >
> > > > Write SPSR_EL1 alongside the other exception registers.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 6c30bfb18d0b ("KVM: arm64: Add handlers for protected VM System Registers")
> > > > Reported-by: sashiko <sashiko at sashiko.dev>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba at google.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c | 1 +
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c
> > > > index 8c3fbb413a06..1a7d5cd16d72 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c
> > > > @@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ static void inject_sync64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 esr)
> > > >
> > > > write_sysreg_el1(esr, SYS_ESR);
> > > > write_sysreg_el1(read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ELR), SYS_ELR);
> > > > + write_sysreg_el1(read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR), SYS_SPSR);
> > > > write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), SYS_ELR);
> > > > write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu), SYS_SPSR);
> > > > }
> > >
> > > Is SPSR_EL1 not set in enter_exception64() using vcpu_cpsr(vcpu), which
> > > *is* set here? I'm just a bit wary of the report, as I'd have expected
> > > fireworks if we weren't initialising the guest's SPSR on the exception
> > > injection path.
> >
> > Yes, enter_exception64() sets SPSR_EL1, but only in memory:
> > __vcpu_write_spsr() takes the nVHE path and calls
> > __vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, SPSR_EL1, val), which writes
> > vcpu->arch.ctxt.sys_regs[SPSR_EL1] without touching the hardware
> > register.
> >
> > In the normal nVHE entry path that memory value reaches hardware via
> > __sysreg_restore_state_nvhe() before __guest_enter(). But
> > inject_sync64() runs inside the fixup_guest_exit() loop, which
> > re-enters the guest directly without a sysreg restore pass. ESR_EL1
> > and ELR_EL1 are already written to hardware by hand for this reason
> > but SPSR_EL1 was missed.
>
> Ah, I see. Does that mean that all the in-memory updates performed by
> enter_exception64() (e.g. the construction of the cpsr) are ignored too?
>From looking at the code, no. inject_sync64() reads back the cpsr and
PC that enter_exception64() computed in memory and writes them to
hardware:
write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), SYS_ELR);
write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu), SYS_SPSR);
So the guest re-enters with the right PSTATE. The only value left
stranded in memory is SPSR_EL1.
Cheers,
/fuad
>
> Will
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list