[PATCH v6 6/6] KVM: arm64: Ensure FFA ranges are page aligned
Sebastian Ene
sebastianene at google.com
Fri Jun 12 09:07:56 PDT 2026
On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 03:02:36PM +0000, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
Hi Mostafa,
> At the moment we only check that the size of the range is page
> aligned, and truncate the address to the page boundary.
> This make an assumption that TZ will do the same.
>
> However, it might decide to use the extra offset of the neighbour
> page at the end, which is valid under FFA if NS is using larger
> page size.
>
> Harden this check by also checking that the base address is aligned
> and reject it otherwise.
>
> Fixes: 436090001776 ("KVM: arm64: Handle FFA_MEM_SHARE calls from the host")
> Signed-off-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa at google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
> index a12e01883314..daf0e328c847 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static u32 __ffa_host_share_ranges(struct ffa_mem_region_addr_range *ranges,
> u64 sz = (u64)range->pg_cnt * FFA_PAGE_SIZE;
> u64 pfn = hyp_phys_to_pfn(range->address);
>
> - if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(sz))
> + if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(sz | range->address))
> break;
>
Should we do the pfn assignment after the check ?
> if (__pkvm_host_share_ffa(pfn, sz / PAGE_SIZE))
> @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static u32 __ffa_host_unshare_ranges(struct ffa_mem_region_addr_range *ranges,
> u64 sz = (u64)range->pg_cnt * FFA_PAGE_SIZE;
> u64 pfn = hyp_phys_to_pfn(range->address);
>
> - if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(sz))
> + if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(sz | range->address))
> break;
>
The same here
> if (__pkvm_host_unshare_ffa(pfn, sz / PAGE_SIZE))
> --
> 2.54.0.746.g67dd491aae-goog
>
Thanks,
Sebastian
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list