[PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Manage teardown with devm
Nicolin Chen
nicolinc at nvidia.com
Thu Jun 11 18:15:25 PDT 2026
On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 09:42:04AM +0100, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> arm_smmu_device_remove() manually frees the IOPF queue, destroys the
> vmid_map and disables the device, while the IRQs and queues are devm
> managed. devm unwinds only after remove() returns, so the cleanup runs
> in the wrong order. The IOPF queue is freed before the event-queue IRQ
> whose handler uses it.
>
> Manage all of it with devm so the unwind order is correct. Free the IOPF
> queue and vmid_map via devm actions, and disable the device from one
> registered after arm_smmu_device_reset().
>
> This is also a prerequisite for fixing a Tegra241 CMDQV CMD_SYNC
> use-after-free in the subsequent patch.
>
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at ziepe.ca>
> Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <skolothumtho at nvidia.com>
Given that the PATCH-2 adds new code to arm_smmu_disable_action()
which is introduced here, should this patch also cc stable tree?
> +static void arm_smmu_free_iopf_action(void *data)
> +{
> + iopf_queue_free(data);
> +}
> +
> +static void arm_smmu_destroy_vmid_map(void *data)
> +{
> + ida_destroy(data);
> +}
[...]
> +static void arm_smmu_disable_action(void *data)
> +{
> + arm_smmu_device_disable(data);
> +}
Jason prefers casting.
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc at nvidia.com>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list