[PATCH v2 05/16] usb: hub: Associate port@ fwnode with USB port device

Bartosz Golaszewski brgl at kernel.org
Thu Jun 11 02:35:13 PDT 2026


On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 10:37 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 04:20:58AM -0400, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:16:12 +0200, Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com> said:
> > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 04:40:39PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > >> When a USB hub port is connected to a connector in a firmware node
> > >> graph, the port itself has a node in the graph.
> > >>
> > >> Associate the port's firmware node with the USB port's device,
> > >> usb_port::dev. This is used in later changes for the M.2 slot power
> > >> sequencing provider to match against the requesting port.
> > >
> > > Okay, would this affect ACPI-based systems? if so, how?
> > > Can you elaborate on that, please?
> >
> > Is it possible that there's an ACPI device node associated with the port like
> > on some DT systems? I don't think so and there should be no impact IMO but I
> > also don't know enough about ACPI.
>
> The API is agnostic. There is a possibility to have software nodes associated
> with the port. I think the best is to be sure that ACPI-aware people who are
> experts in USB will check this (Heikki?).
>

Even if there is a software node - it shouldn't really matter. It will
just be assigned to the port device.

Bart

> Also note Sashiko complain on reference count leakage.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list